Technology, Media Literacy, and the Human Subject: A Posthuman Approach - cover image

Copyright

Richard S. Lewis

Published On

2021-06-03

ISBN

Paperback978-1-80064-182-2
Hardback978-1-80064-183-9
PDF978-1-80064-184-6
HTML978-1-80064-648-3
XML978-1-80064-187-7
EPUB978-1-80064-185-3
MOBI978-1-80064-186-0

Language

  • English

Print Length

264 pages (xii+252)

Dimensions

Paperback156 x 18 x 234 mm(6.14" x 0.72" x 9.21")
Hardback156 x 22 x 234 mm(6.14" x 0.88" x 9.21")

Weight

Paperback1118g (39.44oz)
Hardback1506g (53.12oz)

Media

Illustrations20
Tables4

OCLC Number

1256260600

BIC

  • JNV
  • UBW
  • U
  • GTC
  • JFD
  • HP

BISAC

  • COM060140
  • TEC041000
  • SOC052000

LCC

  • P96.M4

Keywords

  • media literate
  • media infrastructures
  • information and communication technologies (ICTs)
  • media investigations
  • postphenomenology
  • media ecology
  • philosophical posthumanism
  • complexity theory
Thoth logoPowered by Thoth.

Technology, Media Literacy, and the Human Subject

A Posthuman Approach

Winner of the 2021 Harold A. Innis Award for Outstanding Thesis or Dissertation in the Field of Media Ecology.
What does it mean to be media literate in today’s world? How are we transformed by the many media infrastructures around us? We are immersed in a world mediated by information and communication technologies (ICTs). From hardware like smartphones, smartwatches, and home assistants to software like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Snapchat, our lives have become a complex, interconnected network of relations. Scholarship on media literacy has tended to focus on developing the skills to access, analyze, evaluate, and create media messages without considering or weighing the impact of the technological medium—how it enables and constrains both messages and media users. Additionally, there is often little attention paid to the broader context of interrelations which affect our engagement with media technologies.

This book addresses these issues by providing a transdisciplinary method that allows for both practical and theoretical analyses of media investigations. Informed by postphenomenology, media ecology, philosophical posthumanism, and complexity theory the author proposes both a framework and a pragmatic instrument for understanding the multiplicity of relations that all contribute to how we affect—and are affected by—our relations with media technology. The author argues persuasively that the increased awareness provided by this posthuman approach affords us a greater chance for reclaiming some of our agency and provides a sound foundation upon which we can then judge our media relations. This book will be an indispensable tool for educators in media literacy and media studies, as well as academics in philosophy of technology, media and communication studies, and the post-humanities.

Endorsements

Media literacy is often focused on evaluating the message rather than reflecting on the medium. Bringing together postphenomenology, media ecology, posthumanism, and complexity theory, Richard Lewis’s book offers a method for such a reflection and shows how our everyday media environments constitute us as (post)human subjects: one that is becoming and constitutes through relations – also with our media technologies. An original interdisciplinary effort – including for example the term 'intrasubjective mediation' – and a must-read book for everyone interested in how we become with and through technologies.

Prof Mark Coeckelbergh

University of Vienna

Contents

1. Introduction: Problematizing our Relations with Media Technologies

(pp. 1–24)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.01

2. Situating Media Literacy

(pp. 31–58)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.02

3. Understanding the Medium Through the Technological Relation

(pp. 59–92)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.03

4. The Posthuman: Situating the Subject in Human-Tech Relations

(pp. 87–120)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.04

5. Developing the Intrasubjective Mediating Framework

(pp. 131–170)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.05

6. Developing an Instrument to Leverage the Framework

(pp. 171–206)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.06

7. Conclusion

(pp. 201–212)
  • Richard S. Lewis
https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0253.07

Contributors

Richard S. Lewis

(author)
Université Catholique de Lille