📚 Save Big on Books! Enjoy 10% off when you spend £100 and 20% off when you spend £200 (or the equivalent in supported currencies)—discount automatically applied when you add books to your cart before checkout! 🛒

Copyright

Michael Briant

Published On

2025-03-04

Page Range

pp. 1–20

Language

  • English

Print Length

20 pages

Introduction

  • Michael Briant (author)
In 1962 David Astor, then editor of the Observer newspaper, published an article in Encounter on ‘the scourge’, a phenomenon which he described as a perverse morality which leaves those imbued with it with the conviction they have a duty to clean up society by annihilating those they see as corrupting and polluting it. Astor cited the Holocaust as the most recent example of it, but he believed that it had appeared in various guises over the centuries and that it would probably recur, though it might be hard to foresee what form it would take. He argued for the establishment of a research institute to study it, and organised the finance of what became known as the Columbus Centre at Sussex University in 1966. The historian Norman Cohn was appointed as its director because he had written an account of the scourge, ‘The Pursuit of the Millennium’, in the Middle Ages. In the decades that followed the ending of the Second World War and the widespread determination that we must never allow such a cataclysm to happen again, the mission of the Centre was to contribute research that, it was hoped, might prevent its recurrence. In fact there have been further manifestations of it such as those like ISIS that claim the sanction of Islam, but Putin’s Russia could also be viewed as a current version of it.

The book, however, is not a comparative study of current forms of the phenomenon, of the teaching that has inspired them, their organisation, funding and affiliations etc. The formal title of the Columbus Centre was ‘The Institute for the Study of Collective Psychopathology: the aim of the book is to give a critical exposition of that psychopathology in language easily intelligible to the ordinary lay person. The psychology has its origins in psychoanalytic psychotherapy and leads us to us if we can learn anything from its practice as to how we might prevent, or at least contain, the barbarism Astor’s perverse morality encourages, whether the practice of psychotherapy offer us any insights into a different, more inclusive ethics, and, if so, if we can glean any guidance from it on steps we might take to further it.

Contributors

Michael Briant

(author)

Michael Briant is a member of the Guild of Psychotherapists and an Associate member of the Cambridge Society for Psychotherapy. After graduating from the University of Cambridge he worked for the British Council, where, amongst other things he was involved in the cultural exchange agreements which, it was hoped, would further understanding between Britain and the former Soviet Union. He left to pursue post-graduate studies at the L.S.E., where, as a pupil of Ernest Gellner, he wrote a doctoral thesis on psychoanalysis. His experience has mostly been in various parts of the education system, for the last 36 years within the University of Cambridge, where he also directed a postgraduate diploma in psychodynamic studies, run jointly by the University Counselling Service and the Department of Continuing Education. Michael has contributed to leading journals in the field of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis and is the author of “Psychotherapy, Ethics, and Society: Another Kind of Conversation’ (2018), of which this book is a new, revised and expanded edition.