Copyright

Hin-Yan Liu; Kristian Cedervall Lauta; Matthijs Michiel Maas

Published On

2024-09-03

Page Range

pp. 141–176

Language

  • English

Print Length

36 pages

4. Governing Boring Apocalypses

A New Typology of Existential Vulnerabilities and Exposures for Existential Risk Research

Chapter of: An Anthology of Global Risk(pp. 141–176)
Exploring Existential Risk Studies, this chapter argues that focusing solely on preventing the hazards themselves leads to an unnecessary narrow framing of the challenges facing humanity. Existential risks are to be considered simultaneously to the vulnerabilities and exposures inherent within human systems which could contribute to existential consequences for humanity. Dividing these vulnerabilities into either ontological, passive, active, or intentional allows for the identification of a wider range of policy options to be used for risk prevention, lowering the overall probability of an actualised existential risk. Considering vulnerabilities and exposure brings Existential Risk Studies into conversation with disaster studies, allowing different researchers from broader fields to collate together their expertise and to better identify trajectories and devise strategies to mitigate existential risks.

Contributors

Hin-Yan Liu

(author)
Associate Professor at the Centre for European, Comparative, and Constitutional Legal Studies at University of Copenhagen

Hin-Yan Liu is an Associate Professor at the Centre for European, Comparative, and Constitutional Legal Studies, University of Copenhagen.

Kristian Cedervall Lauta

(author)

Matthijs Maas

(author)

Matthijs M. Maas is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Law & AI. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Fe64DJQAAAAJ&hl=en