Preface
|
xi
|
List of Tables
|
xv
|
List of Figures
|
xvii
|
Abbreviations
|
xix
|
Abstract
|
xxiii
|
|
|
1.
|
Setting the Scene
|
1
|
|
1.1
|
Background
|
1
|
|
1.2
|
The Advent of TRIPS and Pharmaceutical Patents
|
7
|
|
1.3
|
The Requirements of TRIPS
|
14
|
|
1.4
|
TRIPS Flexibilities and the Doha Declaration
|
15
|
|
1.5
|
The Experiences of Brazil, China, India and South Africa
|
21
|
|
1.6
|
The Role of the WHO
|
26
|
|
1.7
|
Research Questions and Methodology
|
29
|
|
1.8
|
Chapter Summary
|
34
|
|
|
2.
|
Case Study on Bangladesh’s Pharmaceutical Industry, Legislative and Institutional Framework and Pricing of Pharmaceuticals
|
37
|
|
2.1
|
Introduction
|
37
|
|
2.2
|
Legislative Framework: Pharmaceutical Patents and Pharmaceutical Regulation
|
38
|
|
|
2.2.1
|
Patent Regime: Patent Law and the Patent Office
|
38
|
|
|
2.2.2
|
Pharmaceutical Regulations: Relevant Laws and the Regulatory Body
|
44
|
|
|
2.2.3
|
Changes Required in Patent Law and Pharmaceutical Regulation in Bangladesh
|
56
|
|
2.3
|
The Pharmaceutical Industry in Bangladesh
|
60
|
|
|
2.3.1
|
The Nature and Size of Firms
|
60
|
|
|
2.3.2
|
Competitive Scenario
|
61
|
|
|
2.3.3
|
Local Sales, Export and Import
|
63
|
|
|
2.3.4
|
Production Capacity and Range
|
67
|
|
|
2.3.5
|
Use of Technology
|
69
|
|
|
2.3.6
|
Innovation Capacity and Research and Development
|
70
|
|
|
2.3.7
|
Government Incentives for Supply of Raw Materials and Exports
|
72
|
|
|
2.3.8
|
Human Resources
|
73
|
|
2.4
|
(Potential) Effects of Pharmaceutical Patents on the Pricing of Drugs in Bangladesh
|
74
|
|
2.5
|
Waiver for the Least Developed Countries and the Pharmaceutical Industry in Bangladesh: Opportunities and Challenges
|
82
|
|
2.6
|
Which Way for Bangladesh?
|
85
|
|
|
3.
|
The Experiences of TRIPS-compliant Patent Law Reform in Brazil, China, India and South Africa—Lessons for Bangladesh
|
89
|
|
3.1
|
Background
|
89
|
|
3.2
|
The Journey Towards TRIPS and Obligations for Patent Law Reforms
|
92
|
|
|
3.2.1
|
Patentable Subject Matter
|
95
|
|
|
3.2.2
|
Rights and Obligations of Patentees
|
97
|
|
|
3.2.3
|
The Term of Patent Protection
|
98
|
|
|
3.2.4
|
Enforcement Obligations
|
100
|
|
|
3.2.5
|
Exceptions and Limitations of Exclusive Rights
|
102
|
|
|
3.2.6
|
Provisions on August 30 Decision (Implementation of Para. 6 of the Doha Declaration)
|
102
|
|
3.3
|
The Experience of Brazil
|
106
|
|
3.4
|
The Experience of China
|
114
|
|
3.5
|
The Experience of India
|
120
|
|
3.6
|
The Experience of South Africa
|
129
|
|
3.7
|
Comparative Review and Lessons for the LDCs, including Bangladesh
|
143
|
|
3.8
|
Concluding Remarks
|
148
|
|
|
4.
|
The Globalising Standard of Patent Protection in WTO Law and Policy Options for the LDCs: The Context of Bangladesh
|
149
|
|
4.1
|
Introduction
|
149
|
|
4.2
|
Legislative Options for Bangladesh
|
153
|
|
|
4.2.1
|
A High Threshold and Exclusion Clause
|
153
|
|
|
4.2.2
|
Best Mode Disclosure and Disclosure of the Source of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge
|
158
|
|
|
4.2.3
|
Narrowing the Scope of Patent Claims
|
163
|
|
|
4.2.4
|
Exceptions to Product Patent Rights
|
164
|
|
|
4.2.5
|
Early Working (or Bolar Exceptions), Research and Experimental Use
|
165
|
|
|
4.2.6
|
Parallel Imports
|
169
|
|
|
4.2.7
|
Strong Compulsory Licensing Mechanisms
|
175
|
|
|
4.2.8
|
Prior Use Exceptions
|
186
|
|
|
4.2.9
|
Pre-grant and Post-grant Opposition
|
187
|
|
|
4.2.10
|
Duration of Patent Protection
|
190
|
|
|
4.2.11
|
Do Not Adopt Overprotective Enforcement Provisions
|
192
|
|
4.3
|
Government Intervention Options
|
195
|
|
|
4.3.1
|
Drug Price Control
|
197
|
|
|
4.3.2
|
National Competition Law
|
205
|
|
|
4.3.3
|
Patent Prize System
|
211
|
|
|
4.3.4
|
Limit Data Protection
|
217
|
|
|
4.3.5
|
Patent Pool on Country-specific Diseases
|
220
|
|
|
4.3.6
|
Avoiding Bilateral Investment Treaties or Free Trade Agreements that Erode TRIPS Flexibilities
|
224
|
|
|
4.3.7
|
Utilisation of the Transitional Period for Pharmaceutical Patents
|
228
|
|
|
4.3.8
|
Provision for Process Patent during the Transitional Period and Adoption of a Utility Model Law
|
231
|
|
|
4.3.9
|
Special Investment Protection Regime, Open Drug Innovation Model and Promotion of Social Business Model in the Pharmaceutical Sector
|
233
|
|
4.4
|
Conclusion
|
236
|
|
|
5.
|
Has the TRIPS Waiver Helped the Least Developed Countries Progress Towards Innovation and Compliance?
|
239
|
|
5.1
|
Background: TRIPS Waivers for the LDCs and Designing a Plan of Action for Graduation and Progression Towards Innovation and Compliance
|
239
|
|
5.2
|
Extending the LDC Transition Period: Is it a Measure for Making a Viable Technological Base or Simply a Waste of Time?
|
241
|
|
5.3
|
The Case of Bangladesh: Has the Country Gained from its LDC Status and the Transition Period?
|
245
|
|
5.4
|
Progress Towards Graduation and Compliance
|
248
|
|
|
5.4.1
|
When and How Might LDCs Graduate from this Category?
|
248
|
|
|
5.4.2
|
Competitiveness of the Local (Pharmaceutical) Industry and a Plan for Graduation from the LDC Category and Progress towards TRIPS Compliance: The Context of Bangladesh
|
250
|
|
5.5
|
Progress towards Graduation and Compliance: Institutional and Infrastructural Issues in Bangladesh
|
258
|
|
|
5.5.1
|
Capacity Building in the Department of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, and Intellectual Property-related Institutional and Infrastructural Issues
|
260
|
|
|
5.5.2
|
Capacity Building in the Directorate of Drug Administration and Public Health-related Institutional and Infrastructural Issues
|
264
|
|
5.6
|
Adopting a National Development-centred Intellectual Property Policy and a National Health Strategy Integrating Long-term Innovation and Access Objectives
|
270
|
|
5.7
|
Collaboration between Univeristies, Industry and Government and Public-private Partnerships
|
273
|
|
5.8
|
Limitations and Further Research
|
276
|
|
5.9
|
Concluding Remarks
|
277
|
|
|
Bibliography
|
281
|
Appendices
|
311
|
|
Appendix 1: Status of Patents in Bangladesh (1972–2012)
|
311
|
|
Appendix 2: Relevant Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement
|
313
|
Index
|
319
|