Open Book Publishers logo Open Access logo
  • button
  • button
  • button
GO TO...
Contents
Copyright
book cover
BUY THE BOOK

Bibliography

Alderman, Harold (1978), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Science and Technology,’ in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy, ed. by Michael Murray (New Haven: Yale University), pp. 35–50.

Amsterdamska, Olga (1990), ‘Surely You Are Joking, Monsieur Latour!’ Science, Technology, and Human Values 15(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500407

Aristotle (1941a), De Interpretatione, trans. by E. M. Edghill, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 38–61.

Aristotle (1941b), Categoriae, trans. by E. M. Edghill, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 3–37.

Aristotle (1941c), Physica, trans. by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 213–394.

Aristotle (1941d), On the Heavens, trans. by J. L. Stocks, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 398–466.

Aristotle (1941e), On the Generation of Animals, trans. by Arthur Platt, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 665–80.

Aristotle (1941f), Metaphysics, trans. by W. D. Ross, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. by Richard KcKeon (New York: Random House), pp. 689–926.

Aubrey, John (2014), Brief Lives, with an Apparatus for the Lives of Our English Mathematical Writers, vol. 1, ed. by Kate Bennett (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Averill, James R. (1980a), ‘Emotion and Anxiety: Sociocultural, Biological, and Psychological Determinates,’ in Explaining Emotions, ed. by Amélie O. Rorty (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 37–72.

Averill, James R. (1980b), ‘A Constructivist View of Emotion,’ in Theories of Emotion, ed. by Robert Plutchik and Henry Kellerman (New York: Academic Press), pp. 305–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1

Babich, Babette E. (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science: Calculation, Thought, and Gelassenheit,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 589–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1624-6_36

Bagni, Giorgio T. (2010), ‘Mathematics and Positive Sciences: A Reflection Following Heidegger,’ Education Studies in Mathematics 73(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9214-0

Ballard, Edward G. (1971), ‘Heidegger’s View and Evaluation of Nature and Natural Science,’ in Heidegger and the Path of Thinking, ed. by John Sallis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press), pp. 37–64.

Bambach, Charles (2013), Thinking the Poetic Measure of Justice: Hölderlin-Heidegger-Celan (Albany: SUNY Press).

Barnes, Barry (1974), Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203706541

Barnes, Barry (1977), Interests and the Growth of Knowledge (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315763576

Barnes, Barry (1981), ‘On the “Hows” and “Whys” of Cultural Change (Response to Woolgar),’ Social Studies of Science 11(4), 481–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278101100404

Barnes, Barry (1982), T. S. Kuhn and Social Science (London: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16721-0

Barnes, Barry (1983), ‘Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction,’ Sociology 17(4), 524–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004004

Barnes, Barry (1992a), ‘Relativism, Realism and Finitism,’ in Cognitive Realism and Social Science, ed. by Diederick Raven, Lietke van Vucht and Jan de Wolf (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction), pp. 131–47.

Barnes, Barry (1992b), ‘Status Groups and Collective Action,’ Sociology 26(2), 259–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026002008

Barnes, Barry (1995), The Elements of Social Theory (London: UCL Press). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400864355

Barnes, Barry (2001), ‘Practice as Collective Action,’ in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina and Eike von Savigny (London: Routledge).

Barnes, Barry (2004), ‘On Social Constructivist Accounts of the Natural Sciences,’ in Knowledge and the World: Challenges beyond the Science Wars, ed. by Martin Carrier, Johannes Roggenhofer, Günter Küppers and Philippe Blanchard (Berlin: Springer), pp. 105–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08129-7_5

Barnes, Barry (2011), ‘Relativism as a Completion of the Scientific Project,’ in The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge, ed. by Richard Schantz and Markus Seidel (Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag), pp. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110325904.23

Barnes, Barry and David Bloor (1982), ‘Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge,’ in Rationality and Relativism, ed. by Martin Hollis and Steve Lukes (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 21–47.

Barnes, Barry, David Bloor and John Henry (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis (London: Athlone).

Bartels, Christoph (2010), ‘The Production of Silver, Copper, and Lead in the Harz Mountains from Late Medieval Times to the Onset of Industrialization,’ in Materials and Expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between Market and Laboratory, ed. by Ursula Klein and Emma C. Spary (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 71–100. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439709.003.0004

Bast, Rainer A. (1986), Der Wissenschaftsbegriff Martin Heideggers im Zusammenhang seiner Philosophie (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog Verlag).

Baudelaire, Charles (1964 [1863]), ‘The Painter of Modern Life,’ in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, by Charles Baudelaire, trans. by Jonathan Mayne (London: Phaidon Press), pp. 1–40.

Bijker, Wiebe E. and Trevor Pinch (2012), ‘Preface to the Anniversary Edition,’ in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in Sociology and History of Technology (25th Anniversary Edition), ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes and Trevor Pinch (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), pp. xi–xxxiv. https://books.google.de/books?id=B_Tas3u48f8C

Blackburn, Simon (2004), ‘Lights! Camera! Being!’ New Republic (February 23), 23.

Blattner, William D. (1994), ‘Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist?,’ Inquiry 37(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749408602348

Blattner, William D. (1995), ‘Decontextualization, Standardization, and Deweyan Science,’ Man and World 28, 321–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01273736

Blattner, William D. (2004), ‘Heidegger’s Kantian Idealism Revisited,’ Inquiry 47(4), 321–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740410004160

Bloor, David (1973), ‘Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the Sociology of Mathematics,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4(2), 173–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(73)90003-4

Bloor, David (1983), Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge (London: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17273-3

Bloor, David (1984), ‘The Sociology of Reasons: Or Why “Epistemic Factors” Are Really “Social Factors,”’ in Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, ed. by James Robert Brown (Dordecht: Reidel), pp. 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7688-8_12

Bloor, David (1991 [1976]), Knowledge and Social Imagery, second edn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Bloor, David (1996), ‘Idealism and the Sociology of Knowledge,’ Social Studies of Science 26(4), 839–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026004005

Bloor, David (1997a), ‘Remember the Strong Program?,’ Science, Technology, & Human Values 22(3), 373–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399702200307

Bloor, David (1997b), Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions (London: Routledge).

Bloor, David (1998), ‘A Civil Scepticism,’ Social Studies of Science 28(4), 655–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028004009

Bloor, David (1999a), ‘Anti-Latour,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(98)00038-7

Bloor, David (1999b), ‘Reply to Bruno Latour,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 131–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00040-5

Bloor, David (2000), ‘Whatever Happened to “Social Constructiveness”?,’ in Bartlett, Culture & Cognition, ed. by Akiko Saito (London: Psychology Press), pp. 194–215. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203457504

Bloor, David (2001), ‘What Is a Social Construct?,’ Facta Philosophica 3, 141–56.

Bloor, David (2003), ‘Skepticism and the Social Construction of Science and Technology: The Case of the Boundary Layer,’ in The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays, ed. by Steven Luper (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 249–65.

Bloor, David (2004a), ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ in Handbook of Epistemology, ed. by I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Woleński (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 919–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_25

Bloor, David (2004b), ‘Institutions and Rule-Scepticism: A Reply to Martin Kusch,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704044910

Bloor, David (2007), ‘Epistemic Grace: Antirelativism as Theology in Disguise,’ Common Knowledge 13(2–3), 250–80. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-2007-007

Bloor, David (2011), The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics, 1909–1930 (Chicago: Chicago University Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226060934.001.0001

Bloor, David and David Edge (2000), ‘Knowing Reality through Society,’ Social Studies of Science 30(1), 158–60. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/030631200030001009

Boghossian, Paul A. (2006), Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Borgmann, Albert (1978), ‘Heidegger and Symbolic Logic,’ in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy, ed. by Michael Murray (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 3–22.

Bourgeois, Patrick L. and Sandra B. Rosenthal (1988), ‘Heidegger and Peirce: Beyond “Realism or Idealism,”’ Southwest Philosophy Review 4(1), 103–10. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview19884111

Boyle, Robert (1660 [1966]), New Experiments Physico-Mechanical, Touching on the Spring of the Air, and its Effects; Made, for the Most Part, in an New Pneumatical Engine, in The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 1, by Robert Boyle, ed. by Thomas Birch (Hildesheim: Georg Olms), pp. 1–117.

Boyle, Robert (1662 [1966]), A Defence of the Doctrine Touching the Spring and Weight of the Air, Proposed by Mr. R. Boyle, in his New Physico-Mechanical Experiments; Against the Objections of Franciscus Linus. Wherewith the Objector’s Funicular Hypothesis is also Examined, in The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 1, by Robert Boyle, ed. by Thomas Birch (Hildesheim: Georg Olms), pp. 118–85.

Boyle, Robert (1685 [1966]), An Essay of the Great Effects of Even Languid and Unheeded Motion, in The Works of Robert Boyle, vol. 5, by Robert Boyle, ed. by Thomas Birch (Hildesheim: Georg Olms), pp. 1–37.

Bracken, Patrick J. (2002), Trauma: Culture, Meaning and Philosophy (London: Whurr).

Brandom, Robert (1983), ‘Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time,’ Monist 6(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist198366327

Brown, James Robert (2001), Who Rules in Science? An Opinionated Guide to the Science Wars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Brun, Georg and Dominique Kuenzle (2008), ‘A New Role for Emotions in Epistemology?,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Burnyeat, Miles F. (1982), ‘Gods and Heaps,’ in Language and Logos, ed. by Malcolm Schofeld and Martha Craven Nussbaum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 315–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511550874.017

Burtt, Edwin Arthur (1925), The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822754

Caputo, John D. (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science: The Two Essences of Science,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4362-9_3

Caputo, John D. (2000), ‘Hermeneutics and the Natural Sciences: Heidegger, Science, and Essentialism,’ in More Radical Hermeneutics, by John D. Caputo (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), pp. 151–71, 281–84.

Carson, Cathryn (2010), ‘Science as Instrumental Reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg,’ Continental Philosophy Review 42(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-009-9124-y

Cartwright, Nancy (1999), The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139167093

Celluci, Carlo (2013), Rethinking Logic: Logic in Relation to Mathematics, Evolution, and Method (Dordecht: Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2

Cerbone, David R. (1995), ‘World, World-Entry, and Realism in Early Heidegger,’ Inquiry 38(4), 401–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749508602397

Cerbone, David R. (2005), ‘Realism and Truth,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 248–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch15

Cerbone, David R. (2012), ‘Lost Belongings: Heidegger, Naturalism, and Natural Science,’ in Heidegger on Science, ed. by Trish Glazebrook (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 131–55.

Charland, Louis C. (1998), ‘Is Mr. Spock Mentally Competent? Competence to Consent and Emotion,’ Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 5(1), 67–81. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/28212

Charleton, Walter (1654 [1966]), Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana: Or a Fabrick of Science Natural, Upon the Hypothesis of Atoms (New York: Johnson Reproductions).

Chevalley, Catherine (1992), ‘Heidegger and the Physical Sciences,’ in Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. 4: Reverberations, ed. by Christopher Macaan (London: Routledge), pp. 342–64.

Code, Lorraine (2015), ‘Care, Concern, and Advocacy: Is There a Place for Epistemic Responsibility?,’ Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 1(1), 1–20. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol1/iss1/1/

Collins, Harry M. (1982), ‘Special Relativism — The Natural Attitude,’ Social Studies of Science 12(1), 139–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012001009

Collins, Harry M. (1992 [1985]), Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, with a new foreword (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Collins, Harry M. (1999), ‘The Science Police,’ Social Studies of Science 29(2), 287–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029002012

Collins, Harry M. (2002), ‘The Experimenter’s Regress as Philosophical Sociology,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1), 153–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00033-4

Collins, Harry M. and Trevor Pinch (2007), ‘Who Is to Blame for the Challenger Explosion?,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38(1), 254–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.006

Collins, Harry M. and Steven Yearley (1992), ‘Journey into Space,’ in Science as Practice and Culture, ed. by Andrew Pickering (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 369–89. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668208.001.0001

Crease, Robert P. (1992), ‘The Problem of Experimentation,’ in Phenomenology of Natural Science, ed. by Lee Hardy and Lester Embree (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 215–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2622-9_11

Crease, Robert P. (1993), The Play of Nature: Experimentation as Performance (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Crease, Robert P. (2009), “Covariant Realism,’ Human Affairs 19(2), 223–32. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-009-0035-7

Crombie, Alistair C. (1962), Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science (1100–1700) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Crouthamel, Jason (2002), ‘War Neurosis versus Saving Psychosis: Working-Class Politics and Psychological Trauma in Weimar Germany,’ Journal of Contemporary History 37(2), 163–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094020370020101

Crowell, Steven Galt (1992), ‘Lask, Heidegger, and the Homelessness of Logic,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23(3), 222–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1992.11006996

Crowell, Steven Galt (1994), ‘Making Logic Philosophical Again (1912–1916),’ in Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in his Early Thought, ed. by Theodore Kisiel and John van Buren (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 55–72.

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (2013), The Heidegger Dictionary (London: Bloomsbury).

Damasio, Antonio R. (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons).

Damasio, Antonio R. (1999), The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness (New York: Harcourt Brace & Company).

Daston, Lorraine and Peter Galison (2010), Objectivity (New York: Zone Books).

Davidson, Peter (2009), ‘Francis Line S. J., Explicatio horologii (1673),’ in Jesuit Books in the Low Countries (1540–1773): A Selection from the Maurits Sabbe Library, ed. by Paul Begheyn, S. J., Bernard Deprez, Rob Faesen, S. J., and Leo Kenis (Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters), pp. 187–90.

Dea, Shannon (2009), ‘Heidegger and Galileo’s Slippery Slope,’ Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 48(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217309090040

Dear, Peter (1990), ‘Miracles, Experiments, and the Ordinary Course of Nature,’ Isis 81(4), 663–83. https://doi.org/10.1086/355544

Dear, Peter (1995), Discipline & Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226139524.001.0001

Dear, Peter (1998), ‘Method and the Study of Nature,’ in The Cambridge Companion of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, vol. 1, ed. by Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 147–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.009

Dear, Peter (2001), Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and Its Ambitions, 1500–1700 (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

Dear, Peter (2006a), ‘The Meanings of Experience,’ in The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3: Early Modern Science, ed. by Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 106–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521572446.005

Dear, Peter (2006b), The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226139500.001.0001

de Bruyckere, Anna and Maarten Van Dyck (2013), ‘Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism,’ Perspectives of Science 21(4), 453–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00112

Descartes, René (1969a [1644]), The Principles of Philosophy, trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1, by René Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 201–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805042.007

Descartes, René (1969b [1644]), Rules for the Direction of the Mind, trans. by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1, by René Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805042.007

de Sousa, Ronald (1987), The Rationality of Emotion (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

de Sousa, Ronald (2008), ‘Epistemic Feelings,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 185–204. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Desroches, Dennis (2003), ‘Phenomenology, Science Studies, and the Question of Being,’ Configurations 11(3), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2004.0025

Dijksterhuis, Eduard Jan (1961 [1950]), The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. by C. Dikshoorn (London: Oxford University Press).

Döring, Sabine A. (2010), ‘Why Be Emotional?,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.001.0001

Douglas, Mary (1980), Evans-Pritchard (Sussex: Harvester Press).

Downing, George (2001), ‘Emotion Theory Revisited,’ in Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vol. 2, ed. by Mark A. Wrathall and Jeff Malpas (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 245–70.

Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1991a), ‘Heidegger’s Hermeneutic Realism,’ in The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, ed. by David R. Hiley, James F. Bohman and Richard Shusterman (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0005

Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1991b), Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

Dreyfus, Hubert L. (2001), ‘How Heidegger Defends the Possibility of a Correspondence Theory of Truth with Respect to the Entities of Natural Science,’ in The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr D. Cetina and Eike von Savigny (London: Routledge), pp. 151–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796220.003.0006

Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Charles Spinosa (1999), ‘Coping with Things-in-Themselves: A Practice-Based Phenomenological Argument for Realism,’ Inquiry 42(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017499321624

Dror, Otniel E., Bettina Hitzer, Anjy Laukötter and Pilar León-Sanz, eds. (2016), History of Science and the Emotions (Osiris 31) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.1086/687590

DSM-IV-TR (2000), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edn, text revision (Arlington: American Psychiatric Association).

Elgin, Catherine Z. (2008), ‘Emotion and Understanding,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. (1937), Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford: Clarendon). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912128297

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. (1965), Theories of Primitive Religion (Oxford: Clarendon).

Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. (1970 [1934]), ‘Lévy-Bruhl’s Theory of Primitive Mentality,’ Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 1(2), 39–60. [First appearance: Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, vol. ii (Cairo: Egyptian University, 1934).]

Falcon, Andrea (2015), ‘Aristotle on Causality,’ in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta (Spring 2015 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/aristotle-causality/

Fay, Thomas A. (1977), Heidegger: The Critique of Logic (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1057-3

Feenberg, Andrew (1992), ‘Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy,’ Inquiry 35(3/4), 301–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602296

Feenberg, Andrew (2005), Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203489000

Feenberg, Andrew (2006), ‘Symmetry, Asymmetry, and the Real Possibility of Radical Change: A Reply to Kochan,’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 37(4), 721–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.09.003

Fell, Joseph P. (1989), ‘The Familiar and the Strange: On the Limits of Praxis in the Early Heidegger,’ in Heidegger and Praxis, ed. by Thomas J. Nenon (The Southern Journal of Philosophy 28, Spindel Conference Supplement), pp. 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1990.tb00563.x

Fleck, Ludwik (1979 [1935]), Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, trans. by Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn, ed. by Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Forman, Paul (1971), ‘Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment,’ Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3, 1–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757315

Foucault, Michel (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Pantheon Books).

Freud, Sigmund (1985 [1919]), ‘The “Uncanny,”’ in Art and Literature, vol. 14 of The Penguin Freud Library, ed. by Albert Dickson (London: Penguin Books), pp. 339–76.

Freydberg, Bernard (2002), ‘What Becomes of Science in “The Future of Phenomenology?”’ Research in Phenomenology 32(1), 219–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640260490656

Friedman, Michael (2000), A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger (Chicago: Open Court).

Frijda, Nico H., Antony S. R. Manstead and Sacha Bem, eds. (2000), Emotions and Beliefs: How Feelings Influence Thoughts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511659904

Frijda, Nico H. and Louise Sundararajan (2007), ‘Emotion refinement: A theory inspired by Chinese poetics,’ Perspectives on Psychological Science 2(3), 227–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00042.x

Galen of Pergamon (1944), On Medical Experience, first edn of the Arabic version, with English trans. by Richard Walzer (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Ginev, Dimitri (2005), ‘Against the Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590500249522

Ginev, Dimitri (2011), The Tenets of Cognitive Existentialism (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press).

Ginev, Dimitri (2012), ‘Two Accounts of the Hermeneutic Fore-structure of Scientific Research,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26(4), 423–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.748498

Ginev, Dimitri (2015), ‘The Battle for Mathematical Existentialism and the War of the Heideggerian Succession: Rejoinder to Kochan,’ in Debating Cognitive Existentialism, ed. by Dimitri Ginev (Leiden: Brill Rodopi), pp. 168–93. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004299191_008

Glazebrook, Trish (1998), ‘Heidegger on the Experiment,’ Philosophy Today 42(3), 250–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199842326

Glazebrook, Trish (2000a), Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science (New York: Fordham University Press).

Glazebrook, Trish (2000b), ‘From φύσις to Nature, τέχνη to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton,’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 38, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2000.tb00892.x

Glazebrook, Trish (2001a), ‘Heidegger and Scientific Realism,’ Continental Philosophy Review 34, 361–401. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013148922905

Glazebrook, Trish (2001b), ‘The Role of the Beiträge in Heidegger’s Critique of Science,’ Philosophy Today 45(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200145139

Glazebrook, Trish, ed. (2012a), Heidegger and Science (Albany: SUNY Press).

Glazebrook, Trish (2012b), ‘Why Read Heidegger on Science?,’ in Heidegger on Science, ed. by Trish Glazebrook (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 13–26.

Godin, Benoît and Yves Gingras (2002), ‘The Experimenter’s Regress: From Skepticism to Argumentation,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33(1), 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00032-2

Goffman, Erving (1967), Interaction Ritual (New York: Anchor).

Goldie, Peter (2004), ‘Emotion, Reason, and Virtue,’ in Emotion, Evolution, and Rationality, ed. by Dylan Evans & Pierre Cruse (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 249–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528975.003.0013

Goldie, Peter (2010), Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Greenspan, Patricia (1988), Emotions and Reasons: An Inquiry into Emotional Justification (London: Routledge).

Greenspan, Patricia (2000), ‘Emotional Strategies and Rationality,’ Ethics 110(3), 469–87. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315831848

Gross, Alan G. (2006), ‘The Verbal and the Visual in Science: A Heideggerian Perspective,’ Science in Context 19(4), 443–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889706001037

Gründer, Karlfried (1963), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Science in Its Historical Background,’ Philosophy Today 7(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday1963719

Hacking, Ian (1992), ‘“Style” for Historians and Philosophers,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(92)90024-z

Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of What? (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).

Hacking, Ian (2012), ‘“Language, Truth and Reason” 30 Years Later,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43(4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.002

Haugland, John (2013), Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, ed. by Joseph Rouse (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674074590

Heelan, Patrick (1987), ‘Husserl’s Later Philosophy of Natural Science,’ Philosophy of Science 54 (3), 368–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/289389

Heelan, Patrick (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Longest Day: Twenty-Five Years Later,’ in From Phenomenology to Thought, Errancy, and Desire: Essays in Honor of William J. Richardson, SJ, ed. by Babette E. Babich (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 579–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1624-6_35

Heidegger, Martin (1927), Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag).

Heidegger, Martin (1949), Über den Humanismus (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann).

Heidegger, Martin (1954a), ‘Die Frage nach der Technik,’ in Vorträge und Aufsätze, by Martin Heidegger (Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske), pp. 9–40.

Heidegger, Martin (1954b), ‘Das Ding,’ in Vorträge und Aufsätze, by Martin Heidegger (Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske), pp. 157–79.

Heidegger, Martin (1962a [1927]), Being and Time, trans. by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell).

Heidegger, Martin (1962b [1949]), ‘Letter on Humanism,’ trans. by Edgar Lohner, in Philosophy in the Twentieth Century, vol. 3, ed. by William Barrett and Henry D. Aiken (New York: Random House), pp. 271–302.

Heidegger, Martin (1967 [1962]), What Is a Thing?, trans. by William B. Barton, Jr., and Vera Deutsch (Chicago: Henry Regnery).

Heidegger, Martin (1969), ‘Das Ende der Philosophie und die Aufgabe des Denkens,’ in Zur Sache des Denkens, by Martin Heidegger (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag), pp. 61–80.

Heidegger, Martin (1971a), ‘“…Poetically Man Dwells…,”’ in Poetry, Language, Thought, by Martin Heidegger, trans. by Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 213–29.

Heidegger, Martin (1971b [1954]), ‘The Thing,’ in Poetry, Language, Thought, by Martin Heidegger, trans. by Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 165–86.

Heidegger, Martin (1976 [1967]), ‘On the Being and Conception of φύσις in Aristotle’s Physics B, 1,’ Man and World 9(3), 219–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01249371

Heidegger, Martin (1977a [1952]), ‘The Age of the World Picture,’ in The Question Concerning Technology, by Martin Heidegger, trans. by William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 115–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_3

Heidegger, Martin (1977b [1954]), ‘The Question Concerning Technology,’ in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, by Martin Heidegger, trans. by William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row), pp. 3–35.

Heidegger, Martin (1982a [1975]), Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. by Albert Hofstadter (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1982b), Parmenides (Gesamtausgabe, vol. 54) (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann).

Heidegger, Martin (1984a [1978]), The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. by Michael Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1984b [1962]), Die Frage nach dem Ding: zu Kants Lehre von den transzendentalen Grundsätzen (Gesamtausgabe, vol. 41) (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann).

Heidegger, Martin (1985), History of the Concept of Time, trans. by Theodore Kisiel (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1987/88), ‘Brief an Jean Beaufret / Letter to Jean Beaufret,’ trans. by Steven Davis, Heidegger Studies 3/4, 3–6. https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=heideggerstud&id=heideggerstud_1987_0003_0000_0005_0006

Heidegger, Martin (1992 [1982]), Parmenides, trans. by André Schuwer and Richard Rojcewicz (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1993a [1978]), ‘What Is Metaphysics?,’ trans. by David Farrell Krell, in Basic Writings, revised and expanded edn, by Martin Heidegger, ed. by David Farrell Krell (New York: HarperCollins), pp. 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812637.006

Heidegger, Martin (1993b [1947]), ‘Letter on Humanism,’ trans. by Frank A. Capuzzi and J. Glenn Gray, in Basic Writings, revised and expanded edn, ed. by David Farrell Krell (New York: HarperCollins), pp. 217–65.

Heidegger, Martin (1993c [1969]). ‘The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking,’ trans. by Joan Stambaugh, in Basic Writings, revised and expanded edn, by Martin Heidegger, ed. by David Farrell Krell (New York: HarperCollins), pp. 431–49.

Heidegger, Martin (1995a [1983]), The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude, trans. by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1995b [1985]). Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ 1–3: On the Essence and Actuality of Force, trans. Walter Brogan & Peter Warnek (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1996 [1984]), Hölderlin’s Hymn ‘The Ister, trans. by William McNeill and Julia Davis (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1997 [1929]), Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, fifth edn, enlarged, trans. by Richard Taft (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (1998), ‘Traditional Language and Technological Language,’ trans. by Wanda Torres Gregory, Journal of Philosophical Research 23, 129–45. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_16

Heidegger, Martin (1999 [1989]), Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning), trans. by Pravis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (2000 [1953]), Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt (New Haven: Yale University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (2009 [1998]), Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language, trans. by Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Unna (Albany: SUNY Press).

Heidegger, Martin (2010a [1976]), Logic: The Question of Truth, trans. by Thomas Sheehan (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Heidegger, Martin (2010b), Being and Time, trans. by Joan Stambaugh, revised edn (Albany: SUNY Press).

Heisenberg, Werner (1959), ‘Grundlegende Voraussetzungen in der Physik der Elementarteilchen,’ in Martin Heidegger zum Siebzigsten Geburtstag. Festschrift, ed. by Günther Neske (Pfullingen: Verlag Günther Neske), pp. 291–97.

Heisenberg, Werner (1977), ‘Brief an Martin Heidegger zum 80. Geburtstag,’ in Dem Andenken Martin Heideggers. Zum 26. Mai 1976 (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann), pp. 44–45.

Hempel, Hans-Peter (1990), Natur und Geschichte. Der Jahrhundertdialog zwischen Heidegger und Heisenberg (Frankfurt: Hain).

Hoffman, Piotr (2000), ‘Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism,’ Inquiry 43(4), 403–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017400750051215

Hookway, Christopher (1998), ‘Doubt: Affective States and the Regulation of Inquiry,’ in Pragmatism, ed. by C. J. Misak (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 24), pp. 203–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1998.10717500

Hookway, Christopher (2002), ‘Emotions in Epistemic Evaluations,’ in The Cognitive Basis of Science, ed. by Peter Carruthers, Steven Stich and Michael Siegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 251–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613517.014

Hookway, Christopher (2008), ‘Epistemic Immediacy, Doubt and Anxiety: On a Role for Affective States in Epistemic Evaluation,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), p. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Howson, Colin (2009), ‘Sorites Is No Threat to Modus Ponens: A Reply to Kochan,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2), 209–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903007188

Husserl, Edmund (1965 [1910]), ‘Philosophy as Rigorous Science,’ trans. by Quentin Lauer, in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, by Edmund Husserl (New York: HarperCollins), pp. 71–147.

Husserl, Edmund (1970 [1954]), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. by David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).

Hyder, David and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, eds. (2010), Science and the Life-World: Essays on Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences (Stanford: University of Stanford Press). https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804756044.001.0001

Jagger, Alison M. (1989), ‘Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology,’ in Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Epistemology, ed. by Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (Boston: Unwin Hyman), pp. 129–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748908602185

Jardine, Nicholas (1976), ‘Galileo’s Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7(4), 277–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(76)90009-1

Jünger, Ernst (1929), The Storm of Steel, trans. by Basil Creighton (London: Chatto & Windus).

Kahn, Charles H. (1966), ‘The Greek Verb “To Be” and the Concept of Being,’ Foundations of Language 2, 245–65.

Kant, Immanuel (1956), Critique of Practical Reason, trans. by Lewis White Beck (New York: Macmillan). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809576

Kant, Immanuel (1998 [1781/1787]), Critique of Pure Reason, ed. and trans. by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649

Käufer, Stephan (2001), ‘On Heidegger on Logic,’ Continental Philosophy Review 34(4), 455–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013110920041

Käufer, Stephan (2005), ‘Logic,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L Dreyfus and Mark A. Wrathall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 141–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch9

Kaufman, Doris (1999), ‘Science as Cultural Practice: Psychiatry in the First World War and Weimar Germany,’ Journal of Contemporary History 34(1), 125–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200949903400107

Keller, Evelyn Fox (1982), ‘Feminism and Science,’ Signs 7(3), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1086/493901

Keller, Evelyn Fox (1983), A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman).

Kessler, Eckhard (1988), ‘The Intellective Soul,’ in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. by Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner, Eckhard Kessler and Jill Kraye (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 485–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.017

Kisiel, Theodore J. (1970), ‘Science, Phenomenology, and the Thinking of Being,’ in Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences, Essays and Translations, ed. by Joseph J. Kockelmans and Theodore J. Kisiel (Evanston: Northwestern University Press), pp. 167–83.

Kisiel, Theodore J. (1992), ‘Heidegger and the New Images of Science,’ in Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, vol. 4: Reverberations, ed. by Christopher Macaan (London: Routledge), pp. 325–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916477x00112

Kitcher, Philip (1998), ‘A Plea for Science Studies,’ in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodern Myths about Science, ed. by Noretta Koertge (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195117255.003.0004

Kiverstein, Julian, ed. (2012), Heidegger and Cognitive Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

Klein, Ursula and Emma C. Spary (2010), ‘Introduction: Why Materials?,’ in Materials and Expertise in Early Modern Europe: Between Market and Laboratory, ed. by Ursula Klein and Emma C. Spary (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439709.003.0001

Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-025777-8.50014-1

Kochan, Jeff (2006), ‘Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37(4): 702–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.06.001

Kochan, Jeff (2008), ‘Realism, Reliabilism, and the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590802280878

Kochan, Jeff (2009a), ‘The Exception Makes the Rule: Reply to Howson,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23(2), 213–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903007196

Kochan, Jeff (2009b), ‘Popper’s Communitarianism,’ in Rethinking Popper, ed. by Zuzana Parusniková and Robert S. Cohen (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272) (Berlin: Springer), pp. 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_22

Kochan, Jeff (2010a), ‘Contrastive Explanation and the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ Social Studies of Science 40(1), 127–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709104780

Kochan, Jeff (2010b), ‘Latour’s Heidegger,’ Social Studies of Science 40(4), 579–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709360263

Kochan, Jeff (2011a), ‘Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger,’ Perspectives on Science 19(1), 81–115. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00026

Kochan, Jeff (2011b), ‘Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(3), 467–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.02.003

Kochan, Jeff (2013), ‘Subjectivity and Emotion in Scientific Research,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44(3), 354–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.05.003

Kochan, Jeff (2015a), ‘Scientific Practice and Modes of Epistemic Existence,’ in Debating Cognitive Existentialism, ed. by Dimitri Ginev (Leiden: Brill Rodopi), pp. 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004299191_007

Kochan, Jeff (2015b), ‘Putting a Spin on Circulating Reference, or How to Rediscover the Scientific Subject,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49, 103–07. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.10.004

Kochan, Jeff (2015c), ‘Circles of Scientific Practice: Regressus, Mathēsis, Denkstil,’ in Critical Science Studies after Ludwik Fleck, ed. by Dimitri Ginev (Sophia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press), pp. 83–99.

Kochan, Jeff (2015d), ‘Objective Styles in Northern Field Science,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 52, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.04.001

Kochan, Jeff (2015e), ‘Reason, Emotion, and the Context Distinction,’ Philosophia Scientiae 19(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1036

Kochan, Jeff (2016), ‘Circles of Scientific Practice: Regressus, Mathēsis, Denkstil,’ in Fleck and the Hermeneutics of Science (Collegium Helveticum Heft 14), ed. by Erich Otto Graf, Martin Schmid and Johannes Fehr (Zürich, 2016), pp. 85–93. (Reprint of Kochan (2015c).)

Kochan, Jeff and Hans Bernhard Schmid (2011), ‘Philosophy of Science,’ in The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology, ed. by Sebastian Luft and Søren Overgaard (London: Routledge), pp. 461–72. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816936.ch42

Kockelmans, Joseph J. (1970), ‘Heidegger on the Essential Difference and Necessary Relationship between Philosophy and Science,’ in Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences, Essays and Translations, ed. by Joseph J. Kockelmans and Theodore J. Kisiel (Evanston: Northwestern University Press), pp. 147–66.

Kockelmans, Joseph J. (1985), Heidegger and Science (Lanham: The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, and The University Press of America).

Kohler, Robert E. (2002), Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226450117.001.0001

Kolb, David A. (1983), ‘Heidegger on the Limits of Science,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 14(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1983.11007608

Kovacs, George (1990), ‘Philosophy as Primordial Science (Urwissenschaft) in the Early Heidegger,’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 21(2), 121–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1990.11006890

Kovacs, George (1994), ‘Philosophy as Primordial Science in Heidegger’s Courses of 1919,’ in Reading Heidegger from the Start: Essays in His Earliest Thought, ed. by Theodore Kisiel & John van Buren (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 91–107, 429–31.

Koyré, Alexandre (1931), ‘L’introduction du “Qu’est-ce que la métaphysique?”’ Bifur 8, 5–8.

Koyré, Alexandre (1943a), ‘Galileo and Plato,’ Journal of the History of Ideas 4(4), 400–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707166

Koyré, Alexandre (1943b), ‘Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century,’ Philosophical Review 52(4), 333–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/2180668

Kuhn, Thomas (1977), ‘Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science,’ in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, by Thomas Kuhn (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 31–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/202372

Kusch, Martin (2004a), ‘Reply to My Critics,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 615–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704046600

Kusch, Martin (2004b), ‘Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited,’ Social Studies of Science 34(4), 571–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704044168

Kusch, Martin (2018), ‘Scientific Realism and Social Epistemology,’ in Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, ed. by Juha Saatsi (London: Routledge), pp 261–75.

Langton, Rae (1998), Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves (Oxford: Clarendon Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243174.001.0001

Latour, Bruno (1983), ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World,’ in Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, ed. by Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay (London: SAGE), pp. 141–70.

Latour, Bruno (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Latour, Bruno (1992), ‘One More Turn after the Social Turn…,’ in The Social Dimensions of Science, ed. by Ernan McMullin (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 272–94.

Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard: Harvard University Press).

Latour, Bruno (1999a), ‘For David Bloor … and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s “Anti-Latour,”’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1), 113–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00039-9

Latour, Bruno (1999b), Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Latour, Bruno (2002), ‘The Science Wars: A Dialogue,’ Common Knowledge 8(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-8-1-71

Leung, Ka-wing (2006), ‘Heidegger on the Problem of Reality,’ The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 6, 169–84. Available at https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=nyppp&id=nyppp_2006_0006_0169_0184

Lewens, Tim (2005), ‘Realism and the Strong Program,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56(3), 559–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi125

Linus, Franciscus (1661), Tractatus de Corporum Inseparabilitate in quo Experimenta de Vacuo, tam Torriculliana, quam Magdeburgica, et Boyliana examinantur, veraque eorum causa detecta, ostenditur, vacuum naturaliter dari non posse: unde et Aristotelica de Rarefactione sententia tam contra Assertores Vacuitatum, quam Corpusculorum demonstratur (London: Typis Thomas Roycroft, impensis Joan. Martin, Ja. Allestry & Tho. Ditas). Available at https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KQFRnQEACAAJ

Longino, Helen E. (1993), ‘Subject, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science,’ in Feminist Epistemologies, ed. by Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter (London: Routledge), pp. 101–20.

Lukács, György (1971 [1923]), History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, trans. by Rodney Livingstone (London: Merlin Press).

Ma, Lin and Jaap van Brakel (2014), ‘Heidegger’s Thinking on the “Same” of Science and Technology,’ Continental Philosophy Review 47(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-014-9287-z

Magomed-Eminov, Madrudin S. (1997), ‘Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders as a Loss of the Meaning of Life,’ in States of Mind: American and Post-Soviet Perspectives on Contemporary Issues in Psychology, ed. by Diane F. Halpern and Alexander E. Voiskounsky (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 238–50.

Mannheim, Karl (1984 [1925]), Konservatismus. Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie des Wissens, ed. by David Kettler, Volker Meja and Nico Stehr (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

Mannheim, Karl (1953 [1925]), ‘Conservative Thought,’ in Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology, by Karl Mannheim, ed. by Paul Kecskemeti (London: Routledge), pp. 74–164.

May, Reinhard (1996), Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influence on His Work, trans. by Graham Parkes (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979792

Mayr, Otto (1986), Authority, Liberty & Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press).

McAllister, James W. (2002), ‘Recent Work on Aesthetics of Science,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120118783

McAllister, James W. (2005), ‘Emotion, Rationality, and Decision Making in Science,’ in Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress, ed. by Petr Jájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva and Dag Westerståhl (London: King’s College Publications), pp. 559–76.

McAllister, James W. (2007), ‘Dilemmas in Science: What, Why, and How,’ in Knowledge in Ferment: Dilemmas in Science, Scholarship and Society, ed. by Adriaan in’t Groen, Henk Jan de Jonge, Eduard Klasen Hilje Papma and Piet van Slooten (Leiden: Leiden University Press), pp. 13–24.

McAllister, James W. (2014). ‘Methodological Dilemmas and Emotion in Science,’ Synthese 191, 3143–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0477-3

McGuire, James E. and Barbara Tuchanska (2000), Science Unfettered: A Philosophical Study in Sociohistorical Ontology (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press).

McManus, Denis (2007), ‘Heidegger, Measurement and the “Intelligibility” of Science,’ European Journal of Philosophy 15(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00243.x

McManus, Denis (2012), Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from his Early Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694877.001.0001

McNeill, William (1999), The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory (Albany: SUNY Press).

Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution (San Francisco: Harper & Row).

Mohanty, Jitendranath (1988), ‘Heidegger on Logic,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 26(1), 107–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1988.0014

Morton, Adam (2010), ‘Epistemic Emotions,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 385–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0018

Mosse, George L. (2000), ‘Shell-Shock as a Social Disease,’ Journal of Contemporary History 35(1), 101–08. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200940003500109

Mumford, Lewis (1964), ‘Authoritarian and Democratic Technics,’ Technology and Culture 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3101118

Nagel, Thomas (1987), What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press).

Nicholson, Graeme (2008), ‘Heidegger, Descartes and the Mathematical,’ in Descartes and the Modern, ed. by Neil Robertson, Gordon McOuat and Tom Vinci (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 216–34.

Nieli, Russell (1987), Wittgenstein: From Mysticism to Ordinary Language (Albany: SUNY Press).

Norris, Christopher (1997), Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction and Critical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell).

Norton, John D. (2000), ‘How We Know about Electrons,’ in After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend, ed. by Robert Nola and Howard Sankey (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9_2

O’Brien, Tim (1990), The Things They Carried (New York: Broadway Books).

Osbeck, Lisa M. and Nancy J. Nersessian (2011), ‘Affective Problem-Solving: Emotion in Research Practice,’ Mind & Society 10(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-010-0074-1

Osbeck, Lisa M. and Nancy J. Nersessian (2013), ‘Beyond Motivation and Metaphor: “Scientific Passions” and Anthropomorphism,’ in EPSA 11: Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, ed. by V. Karakostas & D. Dieks (Dordecht: Springer), pp. 455–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_37

Osbeck, Lisa M., Nancy J. Nersessian, Wendy C. Newstetter and Kareen R. Malone (2011), Science as Psychology: Sense-Making and Identity in Scientific Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511933936

Pickering, Andrew (2009), ‘The Politics of Theory: Producing Another World, With Some Thoughts on Latour,’ Journal of Cultural Economy 2(1–2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350903064204

Pickering, Andrew (2010), The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001

Polanyi, Michael (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226232768.001.0001

Popkin, Richard H. (1979), The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (Berkley: University of California Press).

Potter, Elizabeth (2001), Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

Psillos, Stathis (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks the Truth (London: Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979648

Randall, John Herman, Jr (1940), ‘The Development of the Scientific Method in the School of Padua,’ Journal of the History of Ideas 1(2), 177–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/2707332

Randall, John Herman Jr (1961), The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science (Padua: Editrice Antenore).

Ratcliffe, Matthew (2002), ‘Heidegger’s Attunement and the Neuropsychology of Emotion,’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021312100964

Reilly, Conor (1969), Francis Line S. J.: An Exiled English Scientist 1595–1675 (Rome: Institutum Historicum).

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997), Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube (Stanford: University of Stanford Press).

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2010a), An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life (Durham: Duke University Press). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391333

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2010b), On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

Richardson, William J. (1968), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Science,’ New Scholasticism 42(4), 511–36. https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas196842444

Roeser, Sabine (2012), ‘Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design,’ Science and Engineering Ethics 18(1), 103–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0

Rorty, Richard (1991), ‘Is Natural Science a Natural Kind?,’ in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Philosophical Papers, vol. 1), by Richard Rorty (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press), pp. 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643.004

Roubach, Michael (1997), ‘Heidegger, Science, and the Mathematical Age,’ Science in Context 10(1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700000326

Rouse, Joseph (1985), ‘Science and the Theoretical “Discovery” of the Present-at-Hand,’ in Descriptions, ed. by Don Ihde and Hugh J. Silverman (Albany: SUNY Press), pp. 200–10.

Rouse, Joseph (1987a), Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

Rouse, Joseph (1987b), ‘Husserlian Phenomenology and Scientific Realism,’ Philosophy of Science 54(2), 222–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/289371

Rouse, Joseph (1993), ‘What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?,’ Configurations 1(1), 57–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0006

Rouse, Joseph (1996a), Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

Rouse, Joseph (1996b), ‘Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge,’ in Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, ed. by L. H. Nelson and J. Nelson (Dordecht: Kluwer), pp. 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_10

Rouse, Joseph (1998), ‘Heideggerian Philosophy of Science,’ in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4, ed. by Edward Craig (London: Routledge), pp. 323–27.

Rouse, Joseph (1999), ‘Understanding Scientific Practices: Cultural Studies of Science as a Philosophical Program,’ in The Science Studies Reader, ed. by Mario Biagioli (London: Routledge), pp. 442–56.

Rouse, Joseph (2002a), ‘Vampires: Social Constructivism, Realism, and Other Philosophical Undead,’ History and Theory 41, 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00191

Rouse, Joseph (2002b), How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Rouse, Joseph (2005a), ‘Heidegger and Scientific Naturalism,’ in Continental Philosophy of Science, ed. by Gary Gutting (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 123–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755501.ch10

Rouse, Joseph (2005b), ‘Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science,’ in A Companion to Heidegger, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Harrison Hall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 173–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996492.ch11

Rouse, Joseph (2015), Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226293707.001.0001

Sallis, John (1971), ‘Toward the Movement of Reversal: Science, Technology, and the Language of Homecoming,’ in Heidegger and the Path of Thinking, ed. by John Sallis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press), pp. 138–68.

Schatzki, Theodore R. (1992), ‘Early Heidegger on Being, the Clearing, and Realism,’ in Heidegger: A Critical Reader, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Harrison Hall (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 81–98.

Scheff, Thomas J. (1988), ‘Shame and Conformity: The Deference-Emotion System,’ American Sociological Review 53(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095647

Schmitt, Charles B. (1969), ‘Experience and Experiment: A Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De Motu,’ Studies in the Renaissance 16, 80–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2857174

Schwendtner, Tibor (2005), Heideggers Wissenschaftsauffasung: Im Spiegel der Schriften 1919–29 (Frankfurt: Peter Lang).

Schyfter, Pablo (2012), ‘Standing Reserves of Function: A Heideggerian Reading of Synthetic Biology,’ Philosophy & Technology 25(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0053-4

Seigfried, Hans (1980), ‘Scientific Realism and Phenomenology,’ Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 34, 395–404.

Seigfried, Hans (1990), ‘Autonomy and Quantum Physics: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Heisenberg,’ Philosophy of Science 57(4), 619–30.

Serjeantson, Richard W. (2004), ‘Casaubon, Méric,’ in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 10, ed. by H. C. G. Matthews and Brian Harrison (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 464–66.

Shapin, Steven (1988), ‘Robert Boyle and Mathematics: Reality, Representation, and Experimental Practice,’ Science in Context 2(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026988970000048x

Shapin, Steven (1992), ‘Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate,’ History of Science 30(4), 333–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539203000401

Shapin, Steven (1994), A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

Shapin, Steven (1995), ‘Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,’ Annual Review of Sociology 21, 289–321. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.21.1.289

Shapin, Steven (1996), The Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226750224.001.0001

Shapin, Steven (2012), ‘The Sciences of Subjectivity,’ Social Studies of Science 42(2), 170–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435375

Shapin, Steven and Simon Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Shaw, Robert (2013), ‘The Implications for Science Education of Heidegger’s Philosophy of Science,’ Education Philosophy and Theory 45(5), 546–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00836.x

Sherover, Charles (1967), ‘Heidegger’s Ontology and the Copernican Revolution,’ Monist 51(4), 559–73. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196751432

Shirley, Greg (2010), Heidegger and Logic: The Place of Lógos in Being and Time (London: Continuum). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472546661

Skinner, Quentin (2002), ‘Hobbes and the Politics of the Early Royal Society,’ in Visions of Politics, vol. 3: Hobbes and Civil Science, by Quentin Skinner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 324–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613784.015

Skulsky, Harold (1968), ‘Paduan Epistemology and the Doctrine of the One Mind,’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 6(4), 341–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.1596

Smith, Pamela H. (2004), The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226764269.001.0001

Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont (1998), Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science (New York: Picador).

Sokolowski, Robert (1979), ‘Exact Science and the World in which We Live,’ in Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls, ed. by Elisabeth Ströker (Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann), pp. 92–106.

Solomon, Robert C. (1976), The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life (Garden City, NY: Doubleday Press).

Solomon, Robert C. (1977), ‘The Logic of Emotion,’ Noûs 11, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214329

Solomon, Robert C. (1992), ‘Existentialism, Emotions, and the Cultural Limits of Rationality,’ Philosophy East & West 42(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.2307/1399671

Solomon, Robert C. (2003), ‘Emotions, Thoughts and Feelings: What is a “Cognitive Theory” of the Emotions and Does It Neglect Affectivity?,’ in Philosophy and the Emotions, ed. by Anthony Hatzimoysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550270.002

Spiller, Michael R. G. (1980), ‘Concerning Natural Experimental Philosophie’: Méric Casaubon and the Royal Society (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8913-9

Spinosa, Charles (2000), ‘Heidegger on Living Gods,’ in Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, ed. by Mark A. Wrathall and Jeff Malpas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 209–28.

Steiner, Carol J. (1999), ‘Constructive Science and Technology Studies: On the Path to Being?,’ Social Studies of Science 29(4), 583–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029004005

Steiner, Carol J. (2008), ‘Ontological Dance: A Dialogue between Heidegger and Pickering,’ in The Mangle in Practice: Science, Society, and Becoming, ed. by Andrew Pickering and Keith Guzik (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 243–65. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390107

Stepanich, Lambert V. (1991), ‘Heidegger: Between Idealism and Realism,’ The Harvard Review of Philosophy 1(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.5840/harvardreview1991113

Sterelny, Kim (2012), ‘Language, Gesture, Skill: the Co-Evolutionary Foundations of Language,’ in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367, 2141–51. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0116

Stocker, Michael (2010), ‘Intellectual and Other Nonstandard Emotions,’ in The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Emotion, ed. by Peter Goldie (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 401–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.003.0019

Ströker, Elisabeth (1997), The Husserlian Foundations of Science (Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9

Tanzer, Mark Basil (1995), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Realism,’ Southwest Philosophy Review 11(2), 145–59. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview199511228

Tanzer, Mark Basil (1998), ‘Heidegger on Realism and Idealism,’ Journal of Philosophical Research 23, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_1998_14

Thagard, Paul (2001), ‘How to Make Decisions: Coherence, Emotion, and Practical Inference,’ in Varieties of Practical Reasoning, ed. by Elijah Millgram (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 355–71.

Thagard, Paul (2002), ‘The Passionate Scientist: Emotion in Scientific Cognition,’ in The Cognitive Basis of Science, ed. by Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich and Michael Siegal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 235–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613517.013

Thagard, Paul (2006a), ‘How to Collaborate: Procedural Knowledge in the Cooperative Development of Science,’ The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44, 177–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00038.x

Thagard, Paul, in collaboration with Fred Kroon, Josef Nerb, Baljinder Sahdra, Cameron Shelley and Brandon Wager (2006b), Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

Thagard, Paul (2008), ‘How Cognition Meets Emotion: Beliefs, Desires and Feelings as Neural Activity,’ in Epistemology and Emotions, ed. by Georg Brun, Ulvi Doğuoğlu and Dominique Kuenzle (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 167–84. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580128

Tiez, John (1993), ‘Heidegger on Realism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth,’ Dialogue 32(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300014980

Tiez, John (2005), ‘Heidegger on Science, Realism, and the Transcendence of the World: Being and Time, Section 69,’ Idealistic Studies 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20053518

Tomasello, Michael (2014), A Natural History of Human Thinking (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369

Tosh, Nick (2007), ‘Science, Truth and History, Part II. Metaphysical Bolt-holes for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge?,’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38(1), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.002

Traweek, Sharon (1992), Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

Tugendhat, Ernst (1967), Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger (Berlin: de Gruyter). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110826890

van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), ‘A Re-Examination of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Science,’ Dialogue 19(1): 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300024719

von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich (1977a), ‘Begegnungen in vier Jahrzehnten,’ in Erinnerung an Martin Heidegger, ed. by Günther Neske (Pfullingen: Verlag Neske), pp. 239–47.

von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich (1977b), ‘Heidegger und die Naturwissenschaft,’ in Der Garten des Menschlichen: Beiträge zur geschichtlichen Anthropologie, by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker (Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag), pp. 413–31.

von Weizsäcker, Carl Friedrich (1990 [1949]), ‘Beziehungen der theoretischen Physik zum Denken Heideggers,’ in Zum Weltbild der Physik, thirteenth edn, by Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker (Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag), pp. 243–45.

Weber, Max (1968), Economy and Society, trans. by Günther Roth and Claus Wittich (Berkeley: University of California Press).

White, Paul, ed. (2009), The Emotional Economy of Science, focus section in Isis 100(4), 792–851. https://doi.org/10.1086/652019

Winner, Langdon (1980), ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?,’ Daedalus 109(1), 121–36.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958), Philosophical Investigations, third edn, trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

Young, Julian (2006), ‘The Fourfold,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, second edn, ed. by Charles B. Guignon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521821363.015

Zabarella, Jacopo (1995), Über die Methoden (De Methodis); Über den Rückgang (De Regressu), trans. by Rudolf Schicker (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag).

Zabarella, Jacopo (1985), De Methodis; De Regressus, ed. by Cesare Vasoli (Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice).

Zilsel, Edgar (1942), ‘The Sociological Roots of Science,’ American Journal of Sociology 47(4), 544–62. https://doi.org/10.1086/218962

Zimmerman, Michael E. (1990), Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press).

Zoller, David J. (2012), ‘Realism and Belief Attribution in Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Religion,’ Continental Philosophy Review 45(1), 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9208-3