Open Book Publishers logo Open Access logo
  • button
  • button
  • button
GO TO...
Contents
Copyright
book cover
BUY THE BOOK

References

Abulafia, D., ‘The Impact of Italian Banking in the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance, 1300-1500’, in Teichova, A., Kurgan-van Hentenryk, G., and Ziegler, D. (eds.), Banking, Trade and Industry: Europe, America and Asia from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 17-34.

Anderson, P., Lineages of the Absolute State (London: New Left Books, 1974).

Andrewes, W. J. H., ‘Time and Clocks’, in Maran, Stephen P. (ed.), The Astronomy and Astrophysics Encyclopaedia (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991) pp. 929-31.

Anscombe, E. and Geach, P. T. (eds. and transl.), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, with an Introduction by A. Koyré (Sunbury-on-Thames: Nelson, 1976),

Aristotle, Politics, I, ii, 9-11 (Loeb Classical Library, Vol. 21, transl. H. Rackham) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: Heinemann, 1977).

Bacon, F., ‘Aphorisms – Book One’, in The New Organon and Related Writings, ed. by F. H. Anderson (New York: Macmillan/Library of Liberal Arts, 1987).

Bauer, L. and Matis, H., Geburt der Neuzeit. Vom Feudalsystem zur Marktgesellschaft (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1988).

Bayertz, K., ‘Über Begriff und Problem der wissenschaftlichen Revolution’, in Bayertz, K. (ed.), Wissenschaftsgeschichte und wissenschaftliche Revolution (Hürth-Efferen: Pahl-Rugenstein, 1981), pp. 11-28.

‘Was ist moderner Materialismus’, in Bayertz, K., Gerhard, Myriam and Jaeschke, W. (eds.), Weltanschauung, Philosophie und Naturwissenschaft im 19. Jahrhundert, Vol. 1: Der Materialismus-Streit (Hamburg: Meiner, 2007), pp. 50-70.

Becher, J. J., Actorum Laboratorii Chymici Monacensis, Seu Physicae Subterraneae Libri Duo (Frankfurt am Main: J. D. Zunneri, 1669).

― Chymisches Laboratorium Oder Unter-erdische Naturkuendigung (Frankfurt am Main: J. Haass, 1680), with first and second supplements and another publication, Ein Chymischer Raetseldeuter. A second issue appeared in 1690.

Politische Discurs von den eigentlichen Ursachen des Auff- und Abnehmens der Staedt, Laender und Republicken (Frankfurt am Main: Zunner, 1688).

Bedini, S. A. and Solla Price, D. J. da, ‘Instrumentation’, in Kranzberg, M. and Pursell, C. W., Jr. (eds.), Technology in Western Civilization, Vol. 1 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 168-87.

Beretta, M., Clericuzio, A. and Principe, L. M. (eds.), The Accademia del Cimento and its European Context (Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, 2009).

Berg, M., The Age of Manufactures 1700-1820: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain, 2nd ed. (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203990971

Bernal, J. D., The Social Function of Science, 3rd ed. (London: Routledge, 1942).

― The Extension of Man: A History of Physics Before 1900 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1972).

Birch, T., The History of the Royal Society of London for Improving of Natural Knowledge from Its First Rise, in which the Most Considerable of Those Papers Communicated to the Society, which Have Hitherto Not Been Published, are Inserted as a Supplement to the Philosophical Transactions, 4 vols. (London: printed for A. Millar, 1756-1757).

Boas Hall, M., ‘Science in the Early Royal Society’, in Crosland, M. (ed.), The Emergence of Science in Western Europe (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1975), pp. 57-77.

Bohadsch, J. T., Beschreibung einigen in der Haushaltung und Färbekunst nutzbaren Kräutern, die er in seinen durch drey Jahre unternommenen Reisen im Königreich Böheim entdecket hat (Prague: Franz Ignatz Kirchner, 1755).

― Abhandlung vom Gebrauch des Waides in der Haushaltung (Prague: [n. pub.], [n.d.]).

Dienst- und Nutzbarer Patriotischer Vorschlag, wienach dem Königreich Böheim ein ungemeiner Vortheil von sonderbarer Beträchtlichkeit jährlich zuwachsen könnte (Prague, 1758).

Born, I. v., Schreiben des Herrn Ignatz von Born … an Herrn Franz Grafen von Kinsky, Ueber einen ausgebrannten Vulkan bey der Stadt Eger in Boehmen (Prague: Gerle, 1773).

‘Antwort des Herrn von Born, auf das Schreiben des Herrn Grafen von K....’, Abhandlungen, 1 (1775), 253-63.

Bourget, M.-N., Licoppe, Ch. and Sibum, H. O. (eds.), Instruments, Travel and Science: Itineraries of Precision from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203219010

Bowler, P. J. and Rhys Morus, I., Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005).

Breger, H., ‘Becher, Leibniz und die Rationalität’, in Frühsorge, G. and Strasser, G. F. (eds.), Johann Joachim Becher (1635-1682) (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1993), pp. 69-84.

Brooke, J. H., Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

Bryson, B. (ed. and intr.), Seeing Further the Story of Science and the Royal Society (London: HarperPress, 2010).

Buridan, J., The Impetus Theory of Projectile Motion. Transl., intr., and annotated by Marshall Clagett, in Grant, E. (ed.), A Source Book in Medieval Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974), pp. 275-80.

Bylebyl, J. J., ‘Nutrition, Quantification and Circulation’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 51 (1977), 369-85.

Bynum, W. F., Brown, E. J. and Porter, R. (eds.), Dictionary of the History of Science (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1981).

Cardwell, D., The Fontana History of Technology (London: Fontana Press, 1994).

Chilvers, C. A. J., ‘The Dilemmas of Seditious Men: The Crowther-Hessen Correspondence in the 1930s’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 36 (2003), 417-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087403005156

‘La signification historique de Boris Hessen’, in Gerout, S. (ed.), Les Racines sociales et économiques des Principia de Newton (Paris: Vuibert, 2006), pp. 179-206.

Cipolla, C. M., The Economic History of World Population (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962).

‘Introduction’, in Cipolla, C. M. (ed.), The Fontana Economic History of Europe: The Industrial Revolution (London and Glasgow: Collins/Fontana Books, 1973).

Clagett, M. (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1959).

Cohen, H. F., The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994).

Cohen, I. B., ‘The Eighteenth-Century Origins of the Concept of Scientific Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 37 (1976), 257-88.

― The Revolution in Science (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1985).

Coleman, D. C., Myth, History and the Industrial Revolution (London and Rio Grande, OH: Hambledon Press, 1992).

Comenii, J. A., Via Lucis J. A. Komenského Cesta světla (Prague: Státní Pedagogické Nakladatelství, 1961).

Comenius, J. A., Via lucis, vestigata et vestiganda, hoc est rationabilis disquisitio, quibus modis intellectualis animorum Lux, Sapientia, per omnes omnium hominum mentes, et gentes, jam tandem sub mundi vesperam feliciter spargi posit. Libellus ante annos viginti sex in Anglia scriptus, nunc demum typis exscriptus et in Angliam remissus (Amsterdam: Apud Christophorum Cunradu, 1668).

― The Way of Light, trans. E. T. Campagnac (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1938).

Cook, H. J., ‘The New Philosophy in the Low Countries’, in Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Scientific Revolution in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 115-49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170215.005

― Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300117967.001.0001

Corfield, P. J., Time and the Shape of History (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300115581.001.0001

Crombie, A. C., Augustine to Galileo: The History of Science, A.D. 400-1650 (London: Falcon Press, 1952).

― Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science, 1100-1700 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953).

‘Contribution to Discussion of Part Three: Science and Technology in the Middle Ages’, pp. 272-91, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change, Symposium on the History of Science, University of Oxford 9-15 July 1961 (London: Heinemann, 1963), pp. 316-23.

‘Historians and the Scientific Revolution’, Physis: Rivista Internazionale di Storia della Scienza, 11 (1969), 167-80.

― Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation Especially in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts (London: Duckworth, 1994), Vol. 1.

Crosby, A. W., The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society, 1250-1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Crowther, J. G., The Social Relations of Science (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1942).

Cunningham, A., ‘William Harvey and the Discovery of the Circulation of the Blood’, in Porter, R. (ed. and intr.), Man Masters Nature: 25 Centuries of Science (London: BBC Books, 1987), pp. 65-76

Cunningham, A. and Williams, P., ‘De-centring the “Big Picture”: The Origins of Modern Science and The Modern Origins of Science’, in The British Journal for the History of Science, 26/4 (December 1993), pp. 407-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007087400031447

Dainton, B., ‘Past, What Past?’, The Times Literary Supplement, 8 January 2010, 9.

Damerow, P., Renn, J., Rieger, S. and Weinig, P., Mechanical Knowledge and Pompeian Balances, Preprint 145 (Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 2000).

Day, J., ‘Shorter Notices’, The English Historical Review, Vol. 109/432 (1994), 701, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cix.432.701-a

Dear, J. P., Revolutionizing the Sciences: European Knowledge and its Ambitions, 1520- 1700 (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001).

Descartes, Descartes: Philosophical Letters, ed. and transl. by Kenny, A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).

‘Discourse on the Method’, in Anscombe, E. and Geach, P. T. (ed. and transl.), Descartes: Philosophical Writings, with an Introduction by A. Koyré (Sunbury-on-Thames: Nelson, 1976), pp. 5-57.

‘Description of the Human Body’, in Gaukroger, S. (ed.), Descartes: The World and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 170-205, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511605727.009

Dijksterhuis, F. J., ‘Constructive Thinking: A Case for Dioptrics’, in Roberts, L., Shaffer, S. and Dear, P. (eds.), The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialization (Amsterdam: Koninkliijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2007), pp. 59-82.

Drábek, P. (ed.), Tadeáš Hájek z Hájku (Prague: Společnost pro dějiny věd a techniky, 2000).

Dreyer, E. L., Zheng He: China and the Oceans in the Early Ming Dynasty (New York and London: Pearson Longman, 2007).

Efron, N. J., ‘Liberal Arts, Eirenism and Jews in Rudolfine Prague’, Acta historiae rerum naturalium necnon technicarum. Prague Studies in the History of Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (1997), 24-35.

Engels, F., ‘Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy’, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Selected Works in Three Volumes, Vol. 3 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1973), pp. 335-76.

Evans, J., The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Evans, R. J. W., Rudolf II and His World: A Study in Intellectual History, 1576-1612 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).

‘Rudolf II: Prag und Europa um 1600’, in [no editor], Prag um 1600: Kunst und Kultur am Hofe Kaiser Rudolf II, Vol. 1 (Freren: Luca Verlag, 1988), pp. 27-37.

Fara, P., Science: A Four Thousand Year History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

Farrington, B., Francis Bacon: Philosopher of Industrial Science (London: Macmillan; New York: Haskell House, 1973).

Field, J. V., ‘Mathematics and the Craft of Painting: Piero della Francesca and Perspective’, in Field, J. V. and James, Frank A. J. L. (eds. and intr.), Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 73-95.

Field, J. V. and James, Frank A. J. L. (eds. and intr.), Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

Findlen, P., ‘Cabinets, Collecting and Natural Philosophy’, in Fučíková, E. et al., Rudolf II and Prague (Prague: Prague Castle Administration and London and Milan: Thames and Hudson, 1997), pp. 209-19.

Finlay, R., ‘China, the West, and World History in Joseph Needham’s Science and Civilisation in China’, Journal of World History, 11 (2000), 265-303.

Finley, M. I., The Ancient Greeks (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977).

Folta, J. et al., Dějiny exaktních věd v českých zemích do konce 19. století [History of the Exact Sciences in the Czech Lands up to the End of the Nineteenth Century] (Prague: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, 1961).

Forbes, R. J., ‘Metals and Early Science’, Centaurus, 3 (1953-1954), 24-31, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1953.tb00517.x/pdf

Frängsmyr, T. (ed.), Linnaeus: The Man and his Work (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1983).

‘Linnaeus as a Geologist’, pp. 110-55.

Frankenberger, Z., ‘Jan Křtitel Boháč: život a dílo’, Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, 12 (1950), 1-122.

Freudenthal, G., ‘The Hessen-Grossman Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation’, Perspectives on Science, 13/2 (Summer 2005), 166-93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/106361405774270575

Fritsche, J., ‘The Biological Precedents for Medieval Impetus Theory and its Aristotelian Character’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 44/1 (2011), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007087410000774

Frühsorge, G. and Strasser, G. F. (eds.), Johann Joachim Becher (1635-1682) (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1993).

Gascoigne, J., ‘The Royal Society, Natural History and the Peoples of the “New World(s)”, 1660-1800’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 42/155.4 (2009), 539-62.

Gaukroger, S., Descartes: An Intellectual Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

Gaukroger, S. (ed.), Descartes: The World and Other Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511605727

Gellner, E., ‘Along the Historical Highway’, The Times Literary Supplement, 16 March 1984, 279-80.

‘Knowledge of Nature and Society’, in Teich, M., Porter, R. and Gustafsson, B. (eds.), Nature and Society in Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 9-17.

Goodman, D., ‘The Scientific Revolution in Spain and Portugal’, in Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Scientific Revolution in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 158-77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139170215.007

Gould, S. J., Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990).

Graham, A. C., ‘China, Europe, and the Origins of Modern Science: Needham’s The Grand Titration’, in Nakayama, S. and Sivin, N. (eds.), Chinese Science: Explorations of an Ancient Tradition (Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 1973), pp. 45-69.

Grant, E. (ed.), A Source Book in Medieval Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974).

― The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817908

Greenaway, F., ‘Contribution to Discussion of Part Three: Science and Technology in the Middle Ages’, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change (London: Heinemann, 1963), pp. 329-31.

Hacking, I. (ed.), Scientific Revolutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).

Hadden, R. W., On the Shoulders of Merchants: Exchange and the Mathematical Conception of Nature in Early Modern Europe (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1994).

Hagberg, K., Carl Linnaeus, transl. Alan Blair (London: Cape, 1952).

Hahn, R., The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803 (Berkeley, CA and London: University of California Press, 1971).

Hall, A. Rupert, ‘Early Modern Technology to 1600’, in Kranzberg, M. and Pursell, C. W., Jr. (eds.), Technology in Western Civilization, Vol. 1 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 79-103.

― The Revolution in Science, 1500-1750 (London and New York: Longman, 1983), http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315836850

Harkness, D. E., The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2007).

Harnack, A., Geschichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Vol. 2 (Urkunden u. Actenstücke) (Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, 1900).

Haubelt, J., ‘František Josef Kinský’, Věstník Československé akademie věd, 78 (1969), 560-77.

Heath, T. L., The Works of Archimedes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1912), available at https://archive.org/details/worksofarchimede029517mbp

Henry, J., The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997, 3rd ed. 2008).

Henshaw, Mr., ‘The History Of the Making of Salt-Peter’, in Sprat, T., The History of the Royal Society in London (London: Printed by T. R. for J. Martyn and J. Allestry, 1667) pp. 260-76.

[Henshaw, Mr.], ‘The History Of Making Gunpowder’, in Sprat, T., The History of the Royal Society in London, pp. 277-83.

Hessen, B., ‘The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s “Principia” ’, in Science at the Cross Roads, 2nd ed. (London: Cass, 1971), pp. 151-212. With a new Foreword by Needham, J. and a new Introduction by P. G. Werskey.

Hicks, J., A Theory of Economic History (repr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).

Hobsbawm, E., On History (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997).

Holorenshaw, H., [J. Needham], ‘The Making of an Honorary Taoist’, in Teich, M. and Young, R. (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1973), pp. 1-20.

Hook, Mr., ‘A Method For Making a History of the Weather’, in Sprat, T., The History of the Royal Society in London, pp. 173-79.

[Hornigk, Ph. W.], Oesterreich ueber alles wann es nur will, 2nd edn ([n.p.]: [n. pub.], 1685).

Horský, Z., ‘Die Wissenschaft am Hofe Rudolfs II’, in Prag um 1600 Kunst und Kultur am Hofe Kaiser Rudolf II (Freren: Luca Verlag, 1988), pp. 69-74.

Hunter, M., Boyle: Between God and Science (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2009).

Ihde, A. J., The Development of Modern Chemistry (New York: Evanston; London: Harper and Row, 1964).

Inkster, I., ‘Thoughtful Doing and Early-Modern Oeconomy’, in Roberts, L., Shaffer, S. and Dear, P. (eds.), The Mindful Hand: Inquiry and Invention from the Late Renaissance to Early Industrialization (Amsterdam: Koninkliijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2007), pp. 443-52

Isaac, G. L., ‘Aspects of Human Evolution’, in Bendall, D. S. (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 509-43.

Jacob, M. C., ‘The Truth of Newton’s Science and the Truth of Science’s History: Heroic Science at its Eighteenth-Century Formulation’, in M. J. Osler (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) pp. 315-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511529276.016

Jardine, N., The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler’s ‘A Defence of Tycho against Ursus’ with Essays on its Provenance and Significance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Jardine, N. and Segonds, A.-Ph., La Guerre des Astronomes: La Querelle au sujet de l’origine du système géo-héliocentrique à la fin du XVIe siècle. Vol. 1: Introduction (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2008).

― La Guerre des Astronomes: La Querelle au sujet de l’origine du système géo-héliocentrique à la fin du XVIe siècle. Vol. 2/1: Le ‘Contra Ursum de Jean Kepler’, Introduction et textes préparatoires and Vol. 2/2: Le ‘Contra Ursum’ de Jean Kepler, Édition critique, traduction et notes (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2008).

Johnson, Ch. (ed. and transl.), The “De moneta” of Nicholas Oresme and English Mint Documents (London: T. Nelson, 1956).

Jones, J., ‘Natural Wonders’, Saturday Guardian, 26 April 2008, http://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/apr/26/art.art.

Jones, S., Martin, R. and Pilbeam, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

Kaufmann DaCosta, T., Arcimboldo: Visual Jokes, Natural History, and Still-Life Painting (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

Kaye, J., Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century: Money, Market Exchange, and the Emergence of Scientific Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511496523

Kiernan, V. G., State and Society in Europe, 1550-1650 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).

Kinsky, Fr., ‘Schreiben des Herrn Grafen von K… an Herrn von Born ueber einige mineralogische und lithologische Merkwuerdigkeiten’, Abhandlungen, 1 (1775), 243-52.

Knight, D. M., Voyaging in Strange Seas: The Great Revolution in Science (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2014).

Koerner, L., Linnaeus: Nature and Nation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).

Koyré, A., Études galiléennes, 3 vols. (Paris: Hermann, 1939-1940).

Krohn, W., ‘Zur Geschichte des Gesetzesbegriffs in Naturphilosophie und Naturwissenschaft’, in Hahn, M. und Sandkühler, H.-J. (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Bewegung und Naturprozess (Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein, 1981), pp. 61-70.

― Francis Bacon (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1987).

‘Social Change and Epistemic Thought (Reflections on the Origin of the Experimental Method)’, in Hronszky, I., Fehér, M., and Dajka, B. (eds.), Scientific Knowledge Socialized, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 108 (Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer, 1988), pp. 165-78.

Kuhn, T. S., ‘The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research’, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change (London: Heinemann, 1963), pp. 347-69.

― The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd revised ed. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1970).

Landes, D. S., The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge: Canbridge University Press, 1969).

― Revolution in Time (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).

Leakey, R. E., The Origin of Humankind (London: Basic Books, 1994).

Leibniz, ‘Errichtung einer Societät in Deutschland (2. Entwurf)’, in Harnack, A., Geschichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Vol. 2 (Urkunden u. Actenstücke) (Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, 1900), pp. 19-26.

Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

Lindroth, S., ‘The Two Faces of Linnaeus’, in Frängsmyr, T. (ed.), Linnaeus: The Man and his Work (Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press, 1983), pp. 1-62.

Lloyd, G. E. R., Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle (London: Chatto & Windus, 1970).

― Greek Science after Aristotle (London: Chatto and Windus, 1973).

― Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

‘Greek Antiquity: The Invention of Nature’, in Torrance, G. (ed.), The Concept of Nature: The Herbert Spencer Lectures (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992). Reprinted as ‘The Invention of Nature’, in Lloyd, G. E. R., Methods and Problems in Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 417-34.

‘Democracy, Philosophy and Science in Ancient Greece’, in J. Dunn (ed,. Democracy: The Unfinished Journey, 508 BC to AD 1993 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 41-56.

― Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient and Greek Chinese Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Machamer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521581788

Marx, K., Capital, Vol. 1 (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1938).

Mason, P., ‘What Shakespeare Taught Me about Marxism and the Modern World’, The Guardian, 3 November, 2013, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/02/sharkespeare-marxism-feudalism-capitalism.

Mayer, H., ‘Gott und Mechanik Anmerkung zur Geschichte des Naturbegriffs im 17. Jahrhundert’, in Mattl, S. and others, Barocke Natur (Korneuburg: Ueberreuter, 1989), pp. 12-25.

Metzger, H.-D., Thomas Hobbes und die Englische Revolution 1640-1660 (Stuttgart-Bad Constatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991).

Mirsky, J. ‘Tribute, Trade and Some Eunuchs’, The Times Literary Supplement, 26 January 2007, 11.

Mitterauer, M., Why Europe? The Medieval Origin of its Special Path (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226532387.001.0001

Mokyr, J., The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005).

Musson, A. E. and Robinson, E., Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1969).

Needham, J., ‘On Science and Social Change’, Science and Society, 10 (1946), 225-51.

― Science and Civilisation in China, Vols. 2-3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1956-1959).

‘Science and Society in East and West’, in Goldsmith, M. and Mackay, A. (eds.), The Science of Science: Society in Technological Age (London: Souvenir Press, 1964), pp. 127-49.

― The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West (London: Allen & Unwin, 1969).

‘Abstract of Material Presented to the International Maritime History Commission at Beirut’, in Mollat, M. (ed.), Sociétés et Compagnies de Commerce en Orient et dans L’Océan Indien (Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N, 1970), pp. 139-65.

― Moulds of Understanding: A Pattern of Natural Philosophy, ed. and intr. by G. Werskey (London: Allen and Unwin, 1976).

― Wissenschaftlicher Universalismus Über Bedeutung und Besonderheit der chinesischen Wissenschaft, ed., intr. and transl. by T. Spengler (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1979).

Needham, J. with Wang Ling, Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 4/2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).

Needham, J. with Wang Ling and Lu Gwei-Djen, Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 4/3: ‘Civil Engineering and Nautics’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).

Needham, J. and Huang, R. (Huang Jen-Yü), ‘The Nature of Chinese Society – A Technical Interpretation’, Journal of Oriental Studies, repr. from Vol. 12/1 and 2 (1974), 1-16.

North, J., Cosmos: An Illustrated History of Astronomy (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 2008).

O’Brien, P. K., ‘The Needham Question Updated: A Historiographical Survey and Elaboration’, History of Technology, 29 (2009), pp. 7-28.

Ogilvie, S. C. and Cerman, M. (eds.), European Proto-industrialization: An Introductory Handbook (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Oresme, N., The Configurations of Qualities and Motions, including a Geometric Proof of the Mean Speed Theorem, trans., intr. and annotated by Marshall Clagett in Grant, E. (ed.), A Source Book in Medieval Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974).

Osler, M. J. (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511529276

‘The Canonical Imperative: Rethinking the Scientific Revolution’, in Osler, M., Rethinking the Scientific Revolution, pp. 3-22.

Oster, M. (ed.), Science in Europe, 1500-1800: A Primary Sources Reader (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).

Pagel, W., William Harvey’s Biological Ideas: Selected Aspects and Historical Background (Basel and New York: Karger, 1967).

Pedersen, O. and Pihl, M., Early Physics and Astronomy: A Historical Introduction (London: Macdonald and Jane’s and New York: American Elsevier Inc, 1974).

Petráň, J. and Petráňová, L., ‘The White Mountain as a Symbol in Modern Czech History’, in Teich, M. (ed.), Bohemia in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 143-63.

Petty, Sir William, ‘An Apparatus to the History of the Common Practices of Dying’, in Sprat, T., The History of the Royal Society in London, pp. 284-306.

Pickstone, J. V., Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).

Poda, N. von, Kurzgefasste Beschreibung der, bey dem Bergbau zu Schemnitz in Nieder-Hungarn, errichteten Maschinen etc. (Prague: Walther, 1771).

Polišenský, J. V. with Snider, F., War and Society in Europe 1618-1648 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511897016

Polišenský, J., Komenský Muž labyrintů a naděje [Komenský Man of Labyrinths and Hope] (Prague: Academia, 1996).

Pollock, S., Ancient Mesopotamia: The Eden that Never Was (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

Porter, R., ‘The Scientific Revolution: A Spoke in The Wheel?’, in Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), Revolution in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 290-316.

Porter, R., and Teich, M., ‘Introduction’, in Porter and Teich (eds.), The Scientific Revolution, pp. 1-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139170215.001

Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511561283

― Revolution in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

― Romanticism in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

― The Renaissance in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

― The Scientific Revolution in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139170215

Pumfrey, S., ‘‘‘Your Astronomers and Ours Differ Exceedingly”: The Controversy over the “New Star” of 1572 in the Light of a Newly Discovered Text by Thomas Digges’, The British Journal for the History of Science, 44 (2011), 29-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007087410001317

Purš, I. and Karpenko, V. (eds.), Alchymie a Rudolf II: Hledání tajemství přírody ve střední Evropě v 16. a 17. století [Alchemy and Rudolf II Searching for Secrets of Nature in Central Europe in the 16th and 17th Century] (Prague: Artefactum Ústav dějin umění AV ČR, 2011).

Reinalter, H. (ed.), Die Aufklärung in Österreich. Ignaz von Born und seine Zeit (Frankfurt am Main; Bern; New York; Paris: Lang, 1991).

Ritter, J., ‘Metrology, Writing and Mathematics in Mesopotamia’, Acta historiae rerum naturalium necnon technicarum. Prague Studies in the History of Science and Technology, N. S. (1999), 215-41.

Rose, S., ‘Mathematics and the Art of Navigation: The Advance of Scientific Seamanship in Elizabethan England’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 14 (2004), 175-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0080440104000192

Rossi, P., Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1968).

Rudolph, H., ‘Kirchengeschichtliche Beobachtungen zu J. J. Becher’, in Frühsorge, G. and Strasser, G. F. (eds.), Johann Joachim Becher (1635-1682) (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1993), pp. 173-96.

Schaffer, S., ‘Golden Means: Assay Instruments and the Geography of Precision in the Guinea Trade’, in Bourget, M.-N., Licoppe, Ch. and Sibum, H. O. (eds.), Instruments, Travel and Science: Itineraries of Precision from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 20-50.

Scribner, B., Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Reformation in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511599569

Shapin, S., ‘Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate’, History of Science, 30 (1992), 333-69, available at http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/3425943

― The Scientific Revolution (Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).

Sivin, N., ‘An Introductory Bibliography of Traditional Chinese Science. Books and Articles in Western Languages’, in Nakayama and Sivin, Chinese Science Explorations, pp. 279-314.

‘Why the Scientific Revolution Did Not Take Place in China – or Didn’t It?’, in Mendelsohn, E. (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: Essays in Honor of I. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 531-54.

Skinner, Q., Hobbes and Republican Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

Smith, P. H., The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).

Smolka, J., ‘Scientific Revolution in Bohemia’, in Porter and Teich, The Scientific Revolution, pp. 210-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139170215.009

‘Böhmen und die Annahme der Galileischen astronomischen Entdeckungen’, Acta historiae rerum naturalium necnon technicarum. Prague Studies in the History of Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (1997), pp. 41-69.

‘Thaddaeus Hagecius ab Hayck, Aulae Caesarae Majestatis Medicus’, in Enderle-Burcel, G., Kubů, E., Šouša, J. and Stiefel, D. (eds.), “Discourses – Diskurse” Essays for – Beiträge zu Mikuláš Teich & Alice Teichova (Prague and Vienna: Nová tiskárna Pelhřimov, 2008), pp. 395-412.

Sprat, T., The History of the Royal Society in London (London: Printed by T. R. for J. Martyn and J. Allestry, 1667). Repr. and ed. with critical apparatus by Cope, J. I. and Jones, H. W. (St. Louis, MI: Washington University Studies, 1958).

Stern, L., Zur Geschichte und wissenschaftlichen Leistung der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher “Leopoldina” (Berlin: Rütten & Loening, 1952).

Stewart, M., The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz and Spinoza and the Fate of God in the Modern World (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2005).

Strawson, G., ‘Descartes and Elisabeth’, The Times Literary Supplement, 13 February, 2015, 6.

Švejda, A., ‘Prager Konstrukteure wissenschaftlicher Instrumente und ihre Werke’, in Folta, J. (ed.), ‘Science and Technology in Rudolfinian Time’, Acta historiae rerum naturalium necnon technicarum Prague Studies in the History of Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (1997), pp. 90-4.

Teich, M., ‘Tschirnhaus und der Akademiegedanke’, in Winter, E. (ed.), E. W. von Tschirnhaus und die Frühaufklärung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1960), pp. 93-107.

‘The Two Cultures, Comenius and the Royal Society’, Paedagogica Evropea, 4 (1968), 147-53.

‘Afterword’, in Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 215-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511561283.015

‘Bohemia: From Darkness into Light’, in Porter, R. and Teich, M. (eds.), The Enlightenment in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 141-63, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511561283.011

‘Circulation, Transformation, Conservation of Matter and the Balancing of the Biological World in the Eighteenth Century’, Ambix, 29 (1982), 17-28.

‘The Scientific-Technical Revolution: An Historical Event in the Twentieth Century?’, in Porter and Teich, Revolution in History, pp. 317-30.

‘Interdisciplinarity in J. J. Becher’s Thought’, in Frühsorge, G. and Strasser, G. F. (eds.), Johann Joachim Becher (1635-1682) (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1993), pp. 23-40 (previously published in History of European Ideas, 9 (1988), 145-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(88)90036-8

‘Revolution, wissenschaftliche’, in Sandkühler, H. J. (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie, Vol. 2. O-Z (Hamburg: Meiner, 1999), pp. 1394-97.

‘J. D. Bernal: The Historian and the Scientific Technical Revolution’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 33 (2008), 135-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/030801808x259790

Teich, M. (ed.), Bohemia in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Teich, M. with Dorothy M. Needham, A Documentary History of Biochemistry, 1770-1940 (Leicester and London: Leicester University Press, 1992).

Teich, M. and Porter, R. (eds.), The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Teich, M., Porter, R. and Gustafsson, B. (eds.), Nature and Society in Historical Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Teich, M. and Young, R. (eds.), Changing Perspectives in the History of Science (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1973).

Teich, N., ‘Influence of Newton’s Work on Scientific Thought’, Nature, 153 (1944), 42-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/153042a0

Válka, J., ‘Rudolfine Culture’, in Teich, M. (ed.), Bohemia in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 117-42.

Van der Wee, H., ‘The Influence of Banking on the Rise of Capitalism in North-West Europe, Fourteenth to Nineteenth Century’, in Teichova, A., Kurgan-van Hentenryk, G. and Ziegler, D. (eds.), Banking, Trade and Industry: Europe, America and Asia from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 173-88.

Vandermeer, J., ‘The Agroecosystem: The Modern Vision Crisis, The Alternative Evolving’, in Singh, R., Krimbas, C. B., Paul, D. B. and Beatty, J. (eds.), Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives, Vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 480-509.

Waerden, B. L. van der, ‘Basic Ideas and Methods of Babylonian and Greek Astronomy’, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change (London: Heinemann, 1963), pp. 42-60.

Webster, C. (ed.), Samuel Hartlib and the Advancement of Learning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).

― The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626-1660 (London: Duckworth, 1975).

Weld, C. R., A History of the Royal Society, 2 vols. (London: J. W. Parker, 1848).

Westfall, R. S., ‘The Scientific Revolution Reasserted’, in Osler, M. J. (ed.), Rethinking the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 41-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511529276.004

Whaley, J., Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Wilson, P. H., Europe’s Tragedy: A History of the Thirty Years War (London: Penguin, 2010).

Winter, E., ‘Die katholischen Orden und die Wissenschaftspolitik im 18. Jahrhundert’, in Amburger, E., Cieśla, M. C. and Sziklay, L. (eds.), Wissenschaftspolitik in Mittel- und Osteuropa (Berlin: Camen, 1976), pp. 85-96.

Wolff, M., Geschichte der Impetustheorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978).

‘Mehrwert und Impetus bei Petrus Johannis Olivi’, in Miethke, J. and Schreiner, K. (eds.), Sozialer Wandel im Mittelalter (Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1994), pp. 413-23.

Wondrák, E., ‘Die Olmützer “Societas incognitorum”. Zum 225. Jubiläum ihrer Gründung und zum 200. Todestag ihres Gründers’, in Lesky, E., Kostić, D.S.K., Matl, J. and Rauch, G. v. (eds.), Die Aufklärung in Ost- und Südosteuropa (Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau, 1972), pp. 215-28.

Yabuuti, K., ‘Chinese Astronomy: Development and Limiting Factors’, in Nakayama and Sivin, Chinese Science Explorations, pp. 91-103.

Zilsel, E., ‘The Sociological Roots of Science’ [1942], repr. in Raven, D., Krohn, W. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.), Edgar Zilsel: The Social Origins of Modern Science (Dordrecht, Boston, MA and London: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 7-21.