Copyright
Paul M. NoorlanderPublished On
2026-01-07Page Range
pp. 25–108Language
- English
Print Length
84 pages1. Passivisation in Semitic
Case Studies from Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic
This chapter provides a detailed discussion of passive voice constructions in Semitic languages, focusing on Hebrew and Aramaic, with a sideview on Arabic. It examines the historical and typological aspects of passivisation that are characteristic of Semitic, including affixal and templatic voice morphology that serve as detransitivising derivations. The article focuses on the so-called nG-stem in Hebrew and tG-stem in Aramaic and explores their interaction with transitivity and valency, including the passivisation of ditransitive clauses. It points to the fuzzy boundaries between passives and other detransitivisaton strategies such as middles and anticausatives as well as stative verb classes and impersonal subject constructions. It provides a rich documentation of a wide range of agent complements. The chapter also discusses the influence of language contact and the role of passive participles in expressing resultative states, notably in the history of Aramaic and its innovation of a perfect with a dative agent.
Contributors
Paul M. Noorlander
(author)(PhD, Leiden University, 2018) is a Research Associate in Hebrew and Aramaic Studies at the University of Cambridge and Lecturer in Hebrew and Aramaic at Leiden University. He has published widely on Semitic languages, both ancient and modern. His main research concerns the typology of endangered Neo-Aramaic dialects from an areal-diachronic perspective. He is a laureate of a Rubicon Fellowship awarded by the Dutch Research Council and is the author of Ergativity and Other Alignment Types in Neo-Aramaic: Investigating Morphosyntactic Microvariation (Leiden: Brill, 2021).