Copyright
Krist VaesenPublished On
2026-02-06Page Range
pp. 59–78Language
- English
Print Length
20 pages3. Neomania: A short history of the obsession
- Krist Vaesen (author)
Chapter of: Neomania: How Our Obsession With Innovation is Failing Science, and How to Restore Trust(pp. 59–78)
Chapter 3 examines the deep historical roots of our society’s obsession with novelty. In the seventeenth century, thinkers like Bacon recast science as a vehicle for discovery and societal progress, embedding the ideal of the new at its core. Over time, this vision solidified into institutional norms and policy frameworks that define science primarily through its role in driving technological change and economic growth—most notably in innovation models such as the linear model and the Triple Helix.
Other twentieth-century developments entrenched this trajectory. Post-war science was positioned as a driver of national prosperity, and legislation such as the Bayh-Dole Act incentivized commercialization and patenting. Universities evolved into entrepreneurial hubs, forging deep ties with industry and turning research into a marketplace of ideas. The social sciences and humanities were not exempt from this entrepreneurial logic. Increasingly, they were enlisted to facilitate the public acceptance of innovations, positioning themselves as auxiliary engines of progress rather than autonomous domains of inquiry.
Contributors
Krist Vaesen
(author)Associate Professor of Philosophy of Innovation at Eindhoven University of Technology
Krist Vaesen is an Associate Professor of Philosophy of Innovation at Eindhoven University of Technology (the Netherlands) and serves as director and co‑founder of META/e—the Eindhoven Meta‑science Center. This interdisciplinary center focuses on the scientific study of science itself, with expertise in areas such as Open Science, reproducibility, team science, and the role of AI in research. 'Neomania' owes much to the many insightful conversations with members of META/e.