Copyright

Roberto Zoboli

Published On

2025-12-08

Page Range

pp. 157–176

Language

  • English

Print Length

20 pages

10. Investing in Critical Raw Materials for the Clean-Tech Transition in the EU

The procurement of critical raw materials (CRM) could become a fundamental barrier to the development of clean technology and net-zero manufacturing in the EU, thus endangering the achievement of major objectives of EU self-sufficiency in the climate-energy transition. The EU policy framework includes several measures introduced in 2024 and 2025 to push both clean-tech manufacturing and security of supply of CRM in the framework of the EU Competitiveness Compass and the Clean Industrial Deal of 2025. Criticality of materials has been defined as a combination of “economic importance” and “supply risk”. On the side of “economic importance”, an increasing demand for CRM comes from net-zero energy technologies as well as from digital and military technologies. The EU shows a mixed picture in clean-tech sectors: it holds a leadership position in some areas, while in others it faces a high, and increasing, dependency on imports. Although significant investments are underway to boost manufacturing autonomy, these efforts may struggle to keep pace with rapidly rising demand and intensifying external competition, particularly from China. Therefore, the security of supply of CRM has a key role in providing robustness to EU clean-tech value chains. On the side of the ‘supply risk’, CRM have entered a phase marked by international tensions and conflicts, exposing the EU’s high dependency on exporting countries that can quickly become unreliable. Responses and strategies include diversifying the portfolio of supplier countries, expanding domestic mining within the EU, increasing recycling efforts, and investing in research and innovation. All these approaches face distinct barriers, varying degrees of feasibility, and different implementation timeframes. The first consequence of the 2024 CRM policies has been the approval of forty-seven “strategic projects” within the EU and thirteen outside the EU. It is important that these projects are matched by additional investments in clean-tech manufacturing to keep a balanced development across the whole EU domestic value chain for the energy transition. However, a fundamental uncertainty now surrounds the CRM issue, at both the EU and global scale.

Contributors

Roberto Zoboli

(author)
Full Professor of Economic Policy; Research Associate at Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Roberto Zoboli is Full Professor of Economic Policy and teaches “Economic Policies for Resources and the Environment” and “Economics of Natural Resources” at the Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Milan. At the Cattolica, he has been Vice-rector for Research and Sustainability and Director of ASA—Graduate School on the Environment. In the past, he has been a researcher at Nomisma S.p.A., Cariplo Foundation for Scientific Research, and the Research Office of Montedison S.p.A. For twelve years, Roberto has been Research Director at the National Research Council, where, at present, he is Research Associate at IRCrES—Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth. He is Board member of SEEDS, the inter-university centre on “Sustainability, Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies” that gathers environmental and innovation economists from twelve Italian universities. Roberto has been task leader in FP7 and Horizon 2020 projects, and project leader of about seventy research projects at the international, national, and regional level. Since 2001, he has been Task leader within different Topic Centres of the EEA—European Environment Agency, at present the ETC CE—European Topic Centre on Circular Economy and Resource Use (2022–2026). Roberto is author/co-author of about 170 publications in peer-reviewed journals and edited books, in English and Italian, and about seventy research papers and published research reports in the areas of environmental and resource economics, sustainable development, environmental policy, and the economics of eco-innovation.