Copyright
Bryan VescioPublished On
2025-12-02Page Range
pp. 175–200Language
- English
Print Length
26 pages8. Irony as Hope and the Future of the Humanities
Irony has long been the most contested term in CIS, and even Rorty himself has admitted that his concept was flawed. But it is worth rehabilitating the term to preserve Rorty’s sense of a specific role for humanistic intellectuals in liberal democracies. The best way to reconstruct irony is to associate it with hope rather than doubt, as Rorty occasionally does. Refocusing Rorty’s conception of irony in this way makes it just the sort of defense of the humanities that is needed today to counter the tendency to overpromise that continues to plague efforts to justify them.
Contributors
Bryan Vescio
(author)Bryan Vescio is Chair and Professor of English at High Point University. He is the author of Reconstruction in Literary Studies: An Informalist Approach (2014), as well as numerous articles on American authors including Thoreau, Twain, Faulkner, Steinbeck, West and McCarthy. His philosophical work applies pragmatist philosophy and philosophy of language to literary and aesthetic theory, to redefine the role of literary study in higher education today